Re: exim HELO=fully qualified host name?
From: Vincent Lefevre (vincent_at_vinc17.org)
Date: 02/29/04
- Previous message: Wolfgang Pfeiffer: "Re: CUPS Admin (was Re: [Fwd: Re: No printing at all!])"
- In reply to: Derrick 'dman' Hudson: "Re: exim HELO=fully qualified host name?"
- Next in thread: Monique Y. Herman: "Re: exim HELO=fully qualified host name?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 22:16:23 +0100 To: Debian-User <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
On 2004-02-23 22:24:28 -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
> That depends on who's mail server you connect to. Some admins require
> the HELO parameter to be resolvable, and some even require it to
> resolve to the IP of the machine making the connection.
They should fix their configuration, then.
RFC 2821:
An SMTP server MAY verify that the domain name parameter in the EHLO
command actually corresponds to the IP address of the client.
However, the server MUST NOT refuse to accept a message for this
reason if the verification fails: the information about verification
failure is for logging and tracing only.
-- Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@vinc17.org> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/> - 100% validated (X)HTML - Acorn Risc PC, Yellow Pig 17, Championnat International des Jeux Mathématiques et Logiques, TETRHEX, etc. Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / SPACES project at LORIA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- Previous message: Wolfgang Pfeiffer: "Re: CUPS Admin (was Re: [Fwd: Re: No printing at all!])"
- In reply to: Derrick 'dman' Hudson: "Re: exim HELO=fully qualified host name?"
- Next in thread: Monique Y. Herman: "Re: exim HELO=fully qualified host name?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|