Re: locale errors

From: Ashley Graham (ph33rful_at_optonline.net)
Date: 03/26/04

  • Next message: lists_at_pop3.wordit.com: "DNS setup"
    Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 19:06:29 -0500
    To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
    
    

    Chris Metzler wrote:

    >On Thu, 25 Mar 2004 14:42:01 -0500
    >Ashley Graham <ph33rful@optonline.net> wrote:
    >
    >
    >>>Try "dpkg-reconfigure locales" as root. If the locales package is not
    >>>installed, type "apt-get install locales". Please use the archive at
    >>><http://groups.google.com> (Group linux.debian.user) or
    >>><http://liste.debian.org> first next time. This question has been asked
    >>>and answered more then once.
    >>>
    >>>
    >>What question hasn't been asked and answered more than once? What
    >>question is new anymore?
    >>
    >>
    >
    >I see new questions here all the time -- or at least, questions asked so infrequently as to be new to me. If that weren't the case, it's hard for
    >me to imagine that I'd stay subscribed. I like learning this stuff, and
    >I like helping others. But I have lots of things to do as it is, and it'd
    >be pretty hard for me to rationalize sticking around if I wasn't learning
    >much, and if the only people I was helping were people who weren't that
    >interested in helping themselves.
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >>Have you tried looking up info through google lately?
    >>
    >>A quick look-up with the search string "locale settings" returns nothing
    >>that would help me; it does offer attempts to stear me in the right
    >>direction, but I probably would have made other problems in trying to
    >>fix my one.
    >>
    >>
    >
    >When you get an error message, it's usually a good idea to search on
    >the text of the error message itself. In this case, I did a google search
    >of lists.debian.org, on the string "Setting locale failed", and got lots
    >of responses that looked helpful. See below.
    >
    >
    >
    >
    Usually I do that, see below. This one I had a hard time figuring out
    how to pose it, so I assumed that just a simple query here would suffice
    (i guess I was wrong).

    <snip>

    >>I understand that the "noise" and/or extra bandwidth that I used in
    >>sending/receiving comments with this message might have been burdensome
    >>to the server(s), and possibly you, but I received the answer quicker,
    >>and more presice to my dilemma, then if I had gone through google.
    >>
    >>Who's to say what questions are allowed to be answered/asked? Should
    >>they all go through you first; deleting the ones you feel are exotic
    >>enough to actually spend time answering?
    >>
    >>
    >
    >The first clause you wrote above is probably intended to be sarcastic --
    >implying that your one message cannot really have been much of a burden
    >to the list or the respondant. But, as the saying goes, no single
    >raindrop believes itself responsible for the flood. The users of useful
    >technical fora routinely make an effort to discourage redundant questions
    >for the simple reason that they want the fora to *remain useful*. And
    >your second clause -- that you got the answer faster from the list than
    >you would if you'd looked for it yourself -- illustrates another reason
    >this subject strikes a nerve with people: why should volunteers commit
    >their limited energy to helping people who don't seem willing to help
    >themselves? Why not put it towards people who *are*?
    >
    >And feel free to point out the part of his post where he indicated that
    >soem questions aren't "allowed" to be answered or asked.
    >
    >

    I tried to look it up, but searching for the entire string isn't an
    option, but now I know of google groups I will more than likely go there
    in the future, after my first stop with google itself.

    And it wasn't sarcasm; I know that it is a lot of work to route all that
    mail to all those different places, but I figured one more straw
    wouldn't break the camels back.

    >>Secondly, the possible ways of explaining a problem are far from small,
    >>I could have typed away dozens of attempts in google, and still not
    >>gotten an answer. But I did here; in about five minutes.
    >>
    >>
    >
    >I'm glad. At the same time, though, you were kinda lucky.
    >
    >
    >
    <snip>

    >Sometimes, I'll throw this link at them instead:
    >
    >http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
    >
    >

    I've read it before, and usually; my questions are more thought out, and
    more complex than this, honestly they are. But I was just getting
    frustrated with applications not working as I expected, or not at all.

    <snip>

    >
    >Your specific question was "how do I fix this:", with a quote of the
    >perl warning. That specific question has been asked here lots. If
    >that wasn't the question you really wanted to ask -- if your question
    >instead was "I know how to change my locale settings; but how do I
    >gen locales I've defined?" -- then that's what you needed to have
    >typed. Again, you might want to look at the link above. Writing a
    >good question is a skill one can easily develop that not only makes
    >life a lot easier for those who might help you (and thus, makes people
    >more willing and enthusiastic to help you), but also is directly
    >educational (as I think Monique posted in another thread, it's often
    >the case that working on how to pose the question can make the answer
    >come to you). Yeah, this may take more time than just posting a
    >quick query. But you'll be more likely to get an answer when you do,
    >and less likely to seem lazy, and thus not make it past lots of
    >people's filters.
    >
    >
    >
    >
    Working on posing the question has made me not ask it numerous times.

    >>I apologize now for being a giant, swarthy, uncouth, american.
    >>
    >>
    >
    >On this subject (asking questions that one could have found the answer
    >to oneself), the offenders are broadly distributed through the world's
    >nations.
    >
    >
    my nationality wasn't an excuse, it was a warning.

    >-c
    >
    >
    >
    >

    -- 
    To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org 
    with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
    

  • Next message: lists_at_pop3.wordit.com: "DNS setup"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Current and past news on Cuba at your fingertips
      ... [snip portions of PL's already debunked here, or too lame to bother with] ... You mean you get most, if not all of it, from Google News. ... That's bullshit as anyone can confirm by going to the website at ... actually boasting about your lobbying exploits. ...
      (soc.culture.cuba)
    • Re: Current and past news on Cuba at your fingertips
      ... [snip portions of PL's already debunked here, or too lame to bother with] ... You mean you get most, if not all of it, from Google News. ... That's bullshit as anyone can confirm by going to the website at ... actually boasting about your lobbying exploits. ...
      (soc.culture.cuba)
    • Re: Posting Personal Information in This NewsGroup (WAS Re: Autism epidemics: beginning of the end?)
      ... >>responses in Google. ... I don't post responses through ... >>>That is just another repeated lie. ... I do not discredit posters I do not like by calling them liars. ...
      (misc.health.alternative)
    • Re: "open your cb"
      ... <snip for brevity> ... matter of record, as are your excuses. ... killfile and still no response; even when, ... You need to Google back to the original thread from last year. ...
      (rec.radio.cb)
    • Re: (News) Kasparov Introduces New Search Engine
      ... Have you taken a look at Google Finance yet? ... Of course it may not fit in your pocket the way an Ipod ... you could store around 4 GB. ...
      (alt.internet.search-engines)

    Loading