Re: 'su by nobody' - should I be worried?
From: Martin Dickopp (martin-deb_at_zero-based.org)
Date: 03/31/04
- Previous message: Chris Smith: "Does dselect use apt?"
- In reply to: Matthijs: "'su by nobody' - should I be worried?"
- Next in thread: p: "Re: 'su by nobody' - should I be worried?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 00:32:26 +0200
Matthijs <vanaalten@hotmail.com> writes:
> Since a few days, Logcheck reports a lot of messages like this:
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Security Violations for su
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> Mar 30 06:25:02 MyMail su[13083]: (pam_unix) session opened for user
> nobody by (uid=0)
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> I've had similar messages for various users for cron and sshd.
>
> Should I be worried?
Probably not.
> The only way I can read this messages is that user 'nobody' has done a
> 'su' - become root.
No, it's the other way around: 'root' has used 'su' to become 'nobody'.
This is probably part of a script (run by a cronjob?).
Martin
-- ,--. Martin Dickopp, Dresden, Germany ,= ,-_-. =. / ,- ) http://www.zero-based.org/ ((_/)o o(\_)) \ `-' `-'(. .)`-' `-. Debian, a variant of the GNU operating system. \_/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- Previous message: Chris Smith: "Does dselect use apt?"
- In reply to: Matthijs: "'su by nobody' - should I be worried?"
- Next in thread: p: "Re: 'su by nobody' - should I be worried?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]