Boxed deb perl and activestate perl 5.8
From: Vittorio (v.demartino2_at_virgilio.it)
Date: 03/31/04
- Previous message: Pete Clarke: "Re: Eweek article: Debian earns quiet popularity"
- Next in thread: Alex Malinovich: "Re: Boxed deb perl and activestate perl 5.8"
- Reply: Alex Malinovich: "Re: Boxed deb perl and activestate perl 5.8"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 14:36:53 +0100
On my dual-boot (linux debian & win xp) box under linux I have installed
debian testing and the deb perl 5.6 packages boxed with the debian
distribution.
Now, using perl both under linux and win xp I've installed activestate perl
5.8 under M$ win and it looks great!
The same activestate site offer a debianized perl-5.8 package which is
installed under usr/local/bin.
In the opinion of more experienced users than I am is there any advantage for
me to install activestate perl instead of the standard deb packages?
Can both versions of perl coexist?
If I install activestate perl, could I eliminate the boxed debian perl
packages (to avoid duplication, of course) or they're essential for the
installation?
Ciao
Vittorio
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- Previous message: Pete Clarke: "Re: Eweek article: Debian earns quiet popularity"
- Next in thread: Alex Malinovich: "Re: Boxed deb perl and activestate perl 5.8"
- Reply: Alex Malinovich: "Re: Boxed deb perl and activestate perl 5.8"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|