AW: Stable vs. Testing Vs. Unstable
From: Simmel (simmel_at_anymotion.de)
Date: 04/19/04
- Previous message: Math Forum Webmaster: "Re: Mail Delivery (failure webmaster@mathforum.org)"
- In reply to: Loren M. Lang: "Stable vs. Testing Vs. Unstable"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: "'Debian-User Mailing List'" <debian-user@lists.debian.org> Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 11:58:03 +0200
>
> I'm curious about how many people are actually using Debian
> Unstable or
> Testing to Stable for normal desktop use or even a production server.
Hi,
as my systems are all servers, mainly webservers, I use stable.
I'm a paranoid and choose stability & security before "luxury".......but for
my workstation here I use unstable.
Greets,
Simmel
> --
> I sense much NT in you.
> NT leads to Bluescreen.
> Bluescreen leads to downtime.
> Downtime leads to suffering.
> NT is the path to the darkside.
> Powerful Unix is.
>
LOL, nice sig!
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- Previous message: Math Forum Webmaster: "Re: Mail Delivery (failure webmaster@mathforum.org)"
- In reply to: Loren M. Lang: "Stable vs. Testing Vs. Unstable"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
