Re: To dselect or aptitude, that is the question
From: Monique Y. Mudama (spam_at_bounceswoosh.org)
Date: 04/23/04
- Previous message: Kenneth Macdoald Karlsen: "Re: 2.6.4 to 2.6.5 problems w/ a sarge machine"
- In reply to: Michael D Schleif: "Re: To dselect or aptitude, that is the question"
- Next in thread: Michael D Schleif: "Re: To dselect or aptitude, that is the question"
- Reply: Michael D Schleif: "Re: To dselect or aptitude, that is the question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 17:41:52 -0000
On 2004-04-21, Michael D Schleif penned:
>
> I would have been using aptitude long ago, _except_ for this hurdle on
> my systems:
>
> # sudo aptitude -P upgrade
> Password:
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Building Dependency Tree =20
> Reading extended state information... Done
I think this is the relevant part:
> The following packages are unused and will be REMOVED:
Do you have this line in ~/.aptitude/config
aptitude::Delete-Unused "true";
?
Search for "TRACKING UNUSED PACKAGES" in /usr/share/doc/aptitude/README
for more details.
-- monique -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- Previous message: Kenneth Macdoald Karlsen: "Re: 2.6.4 to 2.6.5 problems w/ a sarge machine"
- In reply to: Michael D Schleif: "Re: To dselect or aptitude, that is the question"
- Next in thread: Michael D Schleif: "Re: To dselect or aptitude, that is the question"
- Reply: Michael D Schleif: "Re: To dselect or aptitude, that is the question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|