Re: Upgrading to 2.6.5 switched my physical network interface names
From: Marc Wilson (msw_at_cox.net)
Date: 05/04/04
- Previous message: Jody Grafals: "Microtek ScanMaker 6000"
- In reply to: John van Spaandonk: "Upgrading to 2.6.5 switched my physical network interface names"
- Next in thread: Randy Orrison: "Re: Upgrading to 2.6.5 switched my physical network interface names"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 3 May 2004 15:13:57 -0700 To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 11:23:50PM +0200, John van Spaandonk wrote:
> In Linux 2.6.[45] assignment of eth0,1 is reversed, so now my interface to
> the cable modem has eth1 (this was eth0 in 2.4.x).
> Naturally the network does not work anymore.
So swap the cables. The 2.6 kernel inverts the PCI scan order.
> I believe that in 2.4 the 8139too driver allocates ethx on the MAC address
> of the ethernet cards, lowest MAC address gets eth0 and so on.
No, the kernel does it in the order the cards are enumerated on the PCI
bus. The MAC doesn't have anything to do with it.
Either swap the cables, or swap the slots the cards are in.
--
Marc Wilson | You can fool some of the people all of the time,
msw@cox.net | and all of the people some of the time, but you can
| never fool your Mom.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- Previous message: Jody Grafals: "Microtek ScanMaker 6000"
- In reply to: John van Spaandonk: "Upgrading to 2.6.5 switched my physical network interface names"
- Next in thread: Randy Orrison: "Re: Upgrading to 2.6.5 switched my physical network interface names"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|