Re: Size of default partition with d-i beta3

From: Travis Crump (pretzalz_at_techhouse.org)
Date: 05/22/04

  • Next message: Clyde Wilson: "Re: Newbie Needs Printer Advice"
    Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 00:59:51 -0400
    To: Debian User List <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
    
    
    

    Brent Bailey wrote:
    > On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 17:26, richard lyons wrote:
    >
    >>On Friday 21 May 2004 16:52, Brent Bailey wrote:
    >>
    >>>A couple of weeks ago I installed debian sarge with d-i beta3. I
    >>>kept with the default partition sizes given with the multi-user
    >>>set-up, which set up / with 135468 K on a 80G drive. Now / is
    >>>full, and every other partition is hardly used. I can't mount a
    >>>cdrom to burn a copy of my files from home that I need. All
    >>>partitions are ext3. Is there a way to add more space to /
    >>>(preferably from /home) without having to re-format both
    >>>partitions?
    >>
    >>What is your present partitioning scheme? What do df and mount say?
    >>
    >
    > df:
    > /dev/sda1 135468 134724 0 100% /
    > tmpfs 452892 0 452892 0% /dev/shm
    > /dev/sda5 4807056 1533208 3029664 34% /usr
    > /dev/sda6 2885780 863160 1876032 32% /var
    > /dev/sda7 15022 1060 13161 8% /tmp
    > /dev/sda8 68571736 5397808 59690636 9% /home
    >
    >

    That seems a perfectly reasonable scheme to me. You might want to
    double check that something isn't on the root partition that shouldn't
    be['du -m --max-depth=3 -x / | sort -n']. /root should be almost empty,
    /opt shouldn't be on the root partition if you are using it[putting it
    on the /usr partition is one idea], and nothing should take up a lot of
    space on /etc. The exception to this last point is /etc/gconf, but I
    consider that a bug[which is already reported #227726, but the reporter
    is off by an order of magnitude[/etc/gconf/ is *19MB* for me, I also
    question the need for /etc/X11 to be 15MB, mostly due to
    /etc/X11/xserver/C/print/models/PSdefault/fonts/]]. There also isn't
    much point in having more than 2 kernels on the system. Don't get me
    wrong, it is possible for / to legitimately need more than 130MB[and if
    you really aren't using the space elsewhere than you might as well make
    it bigger], it's just that my / is only 95MB, and I've seen posts from
    other people to suggest that that is on the high end.

    
    

    -- 
    To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org 
    with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
    


  • Next message: Clyde Wilson: "Re: Newbie Needs Printer Advice"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: [SLE] moving my current installation
      ... transfer this installation to a new 160Gb harddrive. ... root partition is /dev/hda5 (1. ... Boot with the resue system CD, log in and make two Mountpoints: ...
      (SuSE)
    • Re: Using dd to create (rotated?) backups
      ... images -- primarily because there are a lot of machines involved (of ... can actually dd that disk (but you still get your ... root partition ro, you practically need to kill everything on the ...
      (comp.os.linux.misc)
    • Re: am2 MBs - 4g + SCSI wipes out root partition
      ... Maybe try having a seperate partition for /tmp, ... Maybe try root partition on SATA, ... to be more clear the machine hangs somewhere in buildworld ... I saw some panics all with mmap and crossreference, ...
      (freebsd-stable)
    • ext3 (?) performance problems on 2.6 kernels
      ... The problem is when writing to an ext3 partition (root partition, ... It goes from I/O bound to 100% cpu bound. ... The oddest part is that on a different ext3 filesystem on a different ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Merge /usr into the root partition
      ... partition, instead of /usr being a directory within the root partition. ... restore /usr, and not to its original partition, but within the mounted / ... the mirror of / before we start, ...
      (comp.sys.sun.admin)