Re: GNU or Open Source Licensing agreenemt.

From: Paul Johnson (baloo_at_ursine.ca)
Date: 06/04/04

  • Next message: Luis Rojas: "Help fixing 'Sarge' Install"
    To: Alvin Oga <aoga@ns.Linux-Consulting.com>
    Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2004 17:34:42 -0700
    
    

    Please do not CC me. Good rule of thumb: unless the Reply-To or
    Mail-Followup-To tells you to send elsewhere, don't CC it when you're
    replying.

    Alvin Oga <aoga@ns.Linux-Consulting.com> writes:

    > On Thu, 3 Jun 2004, Paul Johnson wrote:
    >
    >> There's not 40 GPLs, there's one.
    >
    > version 1 and version 2 ... can be counted as 1 or 2 ??

    The difference between the two is epsilon.

    >> > and what happens when you mix and match various licenses together ... :-)
    >>
    >> Don't. Life's too short to deal with some random developer's
    >> licensing bogosity.
    >
    > as soon as one loads mozilla .. you have a mix of gpl and mpl

    True enough. But just because it's well-known doesn't make it a Good
    Thing(tm). If that were the case, we'd all be happy that the MS-EULA
    is so common because it's so common. Its manageable because both the
    GPL and the MPL fall into being DFSG-free, which is Good Enough(tm)
    for most people.

    > but .. i say just leave it up to the lawyers to decide

    That's more or less my opinion about the whole thing. The non-free
    stuff I make a case-by-case assessment on it if I really need it, the
    free and contrib stuff I don't think a whole lot about when it comes
    to licensing, because I know Debian's social contract all but promises
    I won't get boned.

    > and all these licenses that very few people read and understand
    > will become a bigger problem
    > ( the point, its a big mess of various licenses )

    Which is why Debian's social contract defines what is Free. That way
    the users don't have to grind through the license issues alone.
    There's legal types that volunteer their time on debian-legal sorting
    all that BS out for us (thank God).

    -- 
    Paul Johnson
    <baloo@ursine.ca>
    Linux.  You can find a worse OS, but it costs more.
    
    

    -- 
    To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org 
    with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
    


  • Next message: Luis Rojas: "Help fixing 'Sarge' Install"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: can one build commercial applications with latest gnat and other licenses related questions...
      ... I work for a company, so my boss decides over licensing, not me. ... The problem here might not be the source code but the redistribution ... How do you know whose support contract is it that you won't renew? ... GPL is totally fucked up. ...
      (comp.lang.ada)
    • Re: Moving Userspace RCU (urcu) from GPL to LGPL license
      ... LGPL library rather than GPL so it can be linked to the userspace part ... in userspace and in kernel-space just for a licensing question. ... really like to keep the Linux kernel coding-style within this library. ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: MultiValue Visual Basic
      ... disagreement with you constitutes 'trolling' so I won't be too ... Here is my quote about OpenQM to ... >>> I have many issues with their interpretation of licensing ... well as the GPL verbiage in all of the text files I have read so far. ...
      (comp.databases.pick)
    • Re: Linux Advocates: Only bad thing is the license!
      ... Consult this list of the most common licenses ... go with a better license, but knowing Sun, they won't. ... *how* it's more free than the GPL, ... I set the FUT to COLA because that's ...
      (comp.unix.solaris)
    • Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel
      ... The PyX storage engine supports a scatterlist linked list algorithm that ... information about licensing deals. ... for software that is not entirely licensed under the GPL. ... examples of GPL code for production IP storage fabric and has gained ...
      (Linux-Kernel)

    Loading