Re: 3.0r1 vs 3.0r2
From: Jacob S. (stormspotter_at_6texans.net)
Date: 07/09/04
- Previous message: Andrew Perrin: "Re: document archiving w/ scanner"
- In reply to: Thomas S. Atkins: "3.0r1 vs 3.0r2"
- Next in thread: Steve McIntyre: "Re: 3.0r1 vs 3.0r2"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2004 10:54:20 -0500 To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
On Fri, 09 Jul 2004 11:00:40 -0400
"Thomas S. Atkins" <tatkins@aug.com> wrote:
> I have the r1 cd set. I noticed that a r2 is available. I have not
> installed Debian yet. what is the difference between the two and is it
> worth getting the r2 before I install Debian?
r2 is security updates to r1. If your machine is going to be connected
the internet or a large network, I would recommend using r2. However,
you don't have to buy the cds; you can upgrade over the internet. If you
have a dialup modem though, yea, you'll probably want to get r2 on CDs.
HTH,
Jacob
-- GnuPG Key: 1024D/16377135 Random .signature #15: "What you end up with, after running an operating system concept through these many marketing coffee filters, is something not unlike plain hot water." --Matt Welsh
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: Andrew Perrin: "Re: document archiving w/ scanner"
- In reply to: Thomas S. Atkins: "3.0r1 vs 3.0r2"
- Next in thread: Steve McIntyre: "Re: 3.0r1 vs 3.0r2"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
