Re: /cdrom vs. /media/cdrom
From: Joey Hess (joeyh_at_debian.org)
Date: 07/22/04
- Previous message: Greg Folkert: "Re: Xeon HT or not HT"
- In reply to: Paul Johnson: "Re: /cdrom vs. /media/cdrom"
- Next in thread: Paul Johnson: "Re: /cdrom vs. /media/cdrom"
- Reply: Paul Johnson: "Re: /cdrom vs. /media/cdrom"
- Reply: Kaj Wiik: "Re: /cdrom vs. /media/cdrom"
- Reply: csj: "Re: /cdrom vs. /media/cdrom"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 11:32:48 -0600 To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Paul Johnson wrote:
> I don't have a /media, and my laptop, which I just installed Debian on,
> also doesn't have a /media. ???
Then you didn't install sarge using a current version of the installer.
> I believe the LSB puts removable media in /mnt/fd0, /mnt/scd0, etc.
> Debian puts the same devices in /floppy, /cdrom0, etc.
LSB goes with the FHS locations in this and generally all cases, and
recent FHS versions require /media. Using /mnt subdirectories has always
broken stuff and has never been in the LSB or the FHS.
-- see shy jo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- Previous message: Greg Folkert: "Re: Xeon HT or not HT"
- In reply to: Paul Johnson: "Re: /cdrom vs. /media/cdrom"
- Next in thread: Paul Johnson: "Re: /cdrom vs. /media/cdrom"
- Reply: Paul Johnson: "Re: /cdrom vs. /media/cdrom"
- Reply: Kaj Wiik: "Re: /cdrom vs. /media/cdrom"
- Reply: csj: "Re: /cdrom vs. /media/cdrom"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|