Re: /proc/loadavg disagrees with top and ps
From: Paul Gear (paul_at_gear.dyndns.org)
Date: 08/04/04
- Previous message: Paul Gear: "Re: you may be even more embarassed if you can't deliver"
- In reply to: Nate Duehr: "Re: /proc/loadavg disagrees with top and ps"
- Next in thread: John Summerfield: "Re: /proc/loadavg disagrees with top and ps"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2004 18:31:12 +1000 To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Nate Duehr wrote:
> ...
> emacs!! Hey there's your problem right there! Teach those undergrads to code
> in vi and they'd have had lots more CPU and the box wouldn't have been
> swapping so much!
>
> (LOL! Sorry, it just *had* to be said just for tradition's sake!)
Hallelujah! Preach on, Brother Nate of the Righteous Saints of VI!
-- Paul <http://paulgear.webhop.net> -- Did you know? Using accepted quoting conventions makes your email easier to understand. Learn how at <http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html>.
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- application/pgp-signature attachment: OpenPGP digital signature
- Previous message: Paul Gear: "Re: you may be even more embarassed if you can't deliver"
- In reply to: Nate Duehr: "Re: /proc/loadavg disagrees with top and ps"
- Next in thread: John Summerfield: "Re: /proc/loadavg disagrees with top and ps"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]