Re: why not anaconda installer
From: Michael Satterwhite (michael_at_weblore.com)
Date: 08/23/04
- Previous message: Thomas Adam: "Re: why not anaconda installer"
- In reply to: belahcene abdelkader: "why not anaconda installer"
- Next in thread: Brian Nelson: "Re: why not anaconda installer"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 14:30:22 -0500
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 23 August 2004 14:22, belahcene abdelkader wrote:
> I don't understand yet why debian doesn't use the
> anaconda as
> installer. It is very easy for installation !
> I just tried the new version sarge, it is still
> complicate for new user
> !!!
> is there any reason ? or is there a new installer in
> project
While I haven't used anaconda, I didn't really find the sarge installer
difficult to use - it even set up my wireless card for me flawlessly. I will
grant, however, that there are some questions it asks that someone who is not
a computer geek (I'm guilty as charged) will know how to answer. I understand
that it is a tremendous improvement over the past installer.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBKkXYjeziQOokQnARAjlZAKCzCg9CdF+s19tvyPJDYlS3xiNPdgCdGtJO
atzqYwZde7HWprV79bD7ZxU=
=cy68
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Previous message: Thomas Adam: "Re: why not anaconda installer"
- In reply to: belahcene abdelkader: "why not anaconda installer"
- Next in thread: Brian Nelson: "Re: why not anaconda installer"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
