Re: (Sid) Net broken - Sending streams stall
From: Brendon Higgins (bh_doc_at_users.sourceforge.net)
Date: 09/11/04
- Previous message: J. Hannemann: "Re: Default Mail Client for Mailto"
- Next in thread: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh: "Re: (Sid) Net broken - Sending streams stall"
- Reply: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh: "Re: (Sid) Net broken - Sending streams stall"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 15:23:28 +1000
Executive summary:
KPPP is to blame, pon does not have the behaviour I described.
Details:
I knew older Debian's used to work, so I got out my old Potato CDs to see if
this really was a problem with bad hardware disliking the Linux IP stack. My
theory was that if it was bad hardware Potato would do the same weird things
with file uploads.
I always used KPPP to dialup. I like to have the docked icon and throughput
graph available. Of-course, my Potato CDs didn't come with KDE, so I went the
way of the console, using pppconfig/pon/poff and cftp. They worked fine and
all test uploads went smoothly, just as you would expect. No weird stalling
of uploads that I had experienced, or that you would expect if there was bad
hardware in the way. That made me wonder what was different. It was KPPP.
So I boot up Sid and try dialling by pon. Sure enough, uploads now worked
flawlessly. (And I was able to commit a whole bunch of stuff that had been
waiting for a month.) I hangup and try again in KPPP, and lo and behold
uploads stall at 40K, just as it had been doing before.
So there you go - something is very wrong with my KPPP config (or KPPP
itself). I'm not in a hurry to fix it now that I have a workaround, but any
ideas are welcome. I'll post config files on demand. ;-)
Peace,
Brendon
PS: I'm subscribed, no more CC for me.
You wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Aug 2004, Brendon Higgins wrote:
> > I'd remember, but I don't remember doing anything regarding that
> > particular acronym. At least, not manually.
>
> A new kernel could have it enabled by default, or something...
>
> > Well, my computer can talk to any other, to a degree. For some reason
> > larger
>
> I mean through a router. It certainly is having trouble.
>
> > data just fine, but seems to have trouble sending it. Mind you, this only
> > happens to individual streams, and it does not happen in Win98, which is
> > why I suspect something in my Debian install is broken. Does the Linux
> > TCP/IP implementation really differ that much from Windows that a problem
> > like this is possible to exist in one but not the other?
>
> Yes. Linux TCP/IP is to Win98 TCP/IP what a P4 is to an original 80386SX.
>
> And there are a huge lot of completely buggy TCP/IP routers and firewalls
> out there, that fail to work right as soon as something that was not being
> done before is used. Never mind TCP/IP is forward-compatible, when
> implemented correctly.
>
> Usually, it is Linux and the BSDs that hit those buggy routers first, since
> the Windows TCP/IP stack is something of the stone age that can barely talk
> to others. When you only use the 5 most common words in a language, it
> gets difficult to find others that won't understand you... But don't ask
> it to do anything too dificult.
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: J. Hannemann: "Re: Default Mail Client for Mailto"
- Next in thread: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh: "Re: (Sid) Net broken - Sending streams stall"
- Reply: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh: "Re: (Sid) Net broken - Sending streams stall"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|