Re: Command to find out a running package

From: Adam Funk (a24061_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 09/23/04

  • Next message: David Dorward: "Via CLE266 Graphics"
    Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 10:11:31 GMT
    To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
    
    

    On Wednesday 22 September 2004 08:00, Stephen Liu wrote:

    > Hi folks,
    >
    > I want to find out whether a package has been
    > installed on Debian. Kindly advise what command shall
    > I use equivalent to
    >
    > rpm -q package
    > OR
    > rpm -qa | grep package

    If you know the exact package name:
    dpkg -l package

    If you know it has "foo" in it:
    dpkg -l "*foo*"

    If you know it starts with "foo":
    dpkg -l "foo*"
    etc.

    -- 
    To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org 
    with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
    

  • Next message: David Dorward: "Via CLE266 Graphics"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: RH Veteran is now a Debian Newbie
      ... have to manually track down, and rebuild, package depedencies. ... | So I thought I'd try debian as it seems a little more consistent. ... Using apt ... Note that dpkg is the counterpart to rpm. ...
      (Debian-User)
    • FW: changing roots on: dpkg -i
      ... >> build my own package? ... plus the ~official Debian ... > hard problem that's not real high on the dpkg feature list. ... To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org ...
      (Debian-User)
    • FW: changing roots on: dpkg -i
      ... >> build my own package? ... plus the ~official Debian ... > hard problem that's not real high on the dpkg feature list. ... To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org ...
      (Debian-User)
    • Re: from __future__ import absolute_import ?
      ... foo not in bar ... A path below the package level is generally a good means to shoot ... to represent a python "package" structure. ...
      (comp.lang.python)
    • Re: A Question about DEFPACKAGE syntax
      ... Lisp and for not-really-Common-Lisp ... that it's easier to type:foo than to type "FOO". ... "FOO" does not create superficial symbols in the keyword package ...
      (comp.lang.lisp)