Re: [solved] Re: mounting iPod with USB

From: Nori Heikkinen (nori_at_sccs.swarthmore.edu)
Date: 09/28/04

  • Next message: Blake Swadling: "windows with no decorations"
    Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 23:37:46 -0400
    To: Alan Shutko <ats@acm.org>
    
    
    

    on Mon, 27 Sep 2004 12:52:55PM -0500, Alan Shutko insinuated:
    > Nori Heikkinen <nori@sccs.swarthmore.edu> writes:
    >
    > > - its filesystem type is actually hfsplus. who knew? (this is the
    > > latest-generation iPod, which the box says is for mac or
    > > windows, fwiw).
    >
    > The installation process on Windows reformats the drive to VFAT.

    ok, cool. that makes sense.

    now i'm having a totally different problem, actually: after figuring
    out how to mount it, i put about 500 songs on it, and then
    disconnected and reconnected it a bunch for various reasons.

    now, it won't mount read-write -- just read-only. when i try to mount
    it via the line in my /etc/fstab (which is

    /dev/sda /mnt/ipod hfsplus rw,user,noauto,noatime 0 0

    ), /var/log/syslog gives the error:

    Sep 27 16:12:48 homeruns kernel: HFS+-fs warning: Filesystem was not
    cleanly unmounted, running fsck.hfsplus is recommended. mounting
    read-only.

    and then it mounts it read-only, like it says.

    googling for this, i found a debian-powerpc thread[1] that says that
    after 32 mounts (which i probably did this morning), hfsplus
    partitions will stop being mountable read-write, and to use hpmount
    to get around this. i apt-got installed the hfsplus package with
    those tools in them, but trying to use hpmount gives me the following
    error:

    homeruns:~# hpmount /dev/sda /mnt/ipod
    hpmount: /dev/sda: Neither Wrapper nor native HFS+ volume header found
    (Unknown error 4294967295)

    which is just wack, afaict, seeing as it was mounting happily with
    `mount -t hfsplus` up until 32 mounts (and still does, just r-o).

    any insight how to get around this, to make my iPod read-write again?

    note: this has all been so far on my work computer, which is running
    kernel 2.6.6. i'm going to take this home and try it on my system
    there, which has a 2.4.26 kernel, and see if it's any different there.

    also, i'm using USB 1 here, and USB 1.1 (if that's at all different)
    at home. slow as molasses.

    thanks again,

    </nori>

    [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-powerpc/2004/08/msg00324.html

    -- 
        .~.      nori @ sccs.swarthmore.edu
        /V\  http://www.sccs.swarthmore.edu/~nori
       // \\          @ maenad.net
      /(   )\       www.maenad.net/jnl
       ^`~'^
      
    ++     Sponsor me as I run my SECOND marathon for AIDS:       ++
    ++ http://www.aidsmarathon.com/participant.asp?runner=DC-2844 ++
    
    

    -- 
    To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org 
    with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
    


  • Next message: Blake Swadling: "windows with no decorations"