Re: 100Mbit Lan runs at sloow 417Kbs!!

From: Adamo (im2sexy4you_at_gmail.com)
Date: 09/29/04

  • Next message: Zachary Rizer: "Re: 100Mbit Lan runs at sloow 417Kbs!!" 
    Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 19:02:43 +0200
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org

    oh sorry. i tryed tranfering over samba and SCP same slow speed. on
    the windows machine i used normal windows networking SMB protocol.
    The transfer is between to local machines one windows the other debian.

    On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 09:56:28 -0700 (PDT), Zachary Rizer
    <zrizer@yahoo.com> wrote:
    >
    >
    > --- Adamo <im2sexy4you@gmail.com> wrote:
    >
    > > Hi i had windows on this box before and the speed
    > > was above 3000Kbs i
    > > installed debian and now its a slow 417kbs.
    > > im running sarge with kernel 2.6.8 on a 800Mhz
    > > 512ram machine and
    > > minimal amount of services, there is plenty of cpu
    > > left so thats not
    > > the problem.
    > > its a asus av7 motherboard and the netcard is a
    > > Realtek Semiconductor
    > > Co., Ltd. RTL-8139/8139C/8139C+ (rev 10) card.
    > > my switch is 100Mbits.
    > > Ok got any ideas?
    > > Im desperate!
    > > heres som output
    > >
    > > Output fra mii-tool:
    > > eth0: negotiated 100baseTx-FD, link ok
    > > product info: vendor 00:00:00, model 0 rev 0
    > > basic mode: autonegotiation enabled
    > > basic status: autonegotiation complete, link ok
    > > capabilities: 100baseTx-FD 100baseTx-HD 10baseT-FD
    > > 10baseT-HD
    > > advertising: 100baseTx-FD 100baseTx-HD 10baseT-FD
    > > 10baseT-HD
    > > link partner: 100baseTx-FD 100baseTx-HD 10baseT-FD
    > > 10baseT-HD flow-control
    > >
    > > output from ifconfig:
    > > eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr
    > > 00:C0:26:78:14:A1
    > > inet addr:192.168.0.100
    > > Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
    > > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500
    > > Metric:1
    > > RX packets:599881 errors:0 dropped:0
    > > overruns:0 frame:0
    > > TX packets:795532 errors:0 dropped:0
    > > overruns:0 carrier:0
    > > collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
    > > RX bytes:173192384 (165.1 MiB) TX
    > > bytes:842761893 (803.7 MiB)
    > > Interrupt:3 Base address:0x7000
    > >
    > >
    > > --
    > > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
    > > debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
    > > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
    > > listmaster@lists.debian.org
    > >
    > >
    >
    > It runs slow when? When transferring files between
    > two local machines? Using what protocol, ftp, http,
    > smb, nfs, other? How are you measuring the
    > throughput? How did you measure it when you ran
    > windows? There are far more variables at play here
    > than you may think.
    >
    > ~Zaq
    > 

    -- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
  • Next message: Zachary Rizer: "Re: 100Mbit Lan runs at sloow 417Kbs!!"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Cryptogram Comment
      ... >> bother me with Windows questions. ... >> machines are broken. ... Just like if you don't know to tune up your car every year then you ... > and Linux and other open OS's make all patches FREE to redistribute. ...
      (sci.crypt)
    • What Does It Take to Get a PC With XP?
      ... I won't waste time rehashing the argument over whether Windows Vista ... that virtually every copy of Vista Business or Vista Ultimate Edition ... machines doesn't mean that its employees understand that policy. ...
      (misc.consumers)
    • [Full-Disclosure] RE: M$ - so what should they do?
      ... >isn't a basic windows design piece. ... or getting their machines loaded with adware and spyware ... heart of the problem of machines connected to the Internet, ...
      (Full-Disclosure)
    • Re: Need tutorials, guides... However...
      ... performance loss you'll get from an OS like Windows or Linux. ... machines out there have gone off in many different directions. ... expect to find certain hardware at certain addressess. ...
      (alt.lang.asm)
    • Re: Saw 10.4.1 Running On a PC Laptop Today
      ... People would no longer differentiate between Macs and PCs and most would just stick with the Windows OS that came with their box. ... Apple would no longer be innovative as it now and eventually be marginalized out of business. ... The fact is, Windows users use Windows NOT because "it works, and that's all that counts", but because it is the ONLY real game in town for Intel machines, and because Apples are JUST TOO EXPENSIVE for the common man and corporations to embrace that paradigm. ... most Windows users would rather switch to OSX than continue to put up with Microsoft's machinations in the computer world. ...
      (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)