Re: :SPAM: Re: 100Mbit Lan runs at sloow 417Kbs!!

From: Marcos Carneiro da Rocha (mcrocha_at_terra.com.br)
Date: 10/01/04

  • Next message: Paul Johnson: "Re: Updating regularly" 
    To: Adamo <im2sexy4you@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 15:51:06 -0300

    What version of samba are you using ???
    there is a problem with samba - slow performance.
    try to use newer version of samba package.
    or if you are already using the latest version of samba, verify smb.conf
    file to adjust for better performance - try to adjust the socket options
    parameter.

    Marcos

    On Thu, 2004-09-30 at 02:59, Adamo wrote:
    > ive checked and the windows part i ok
    >
    >
    > On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:37:31 -0400, Paul Tsai <paul@thirdaspect.net> wrote:
    > > Jacob S wrote:
    > >
    > > >On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 13:56:40 -0400
    > >
    > >
    > > >Paul Tsai <paul@thirdaspect.net> wrote:
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >>Zachary Rizer wrote:
    > > >>
    > > >>
    > > >>
    > > >>>--- Adamo <im2sexy4you@gmail.com> wrote:
    > > >>>
    > > >>>
    > > >>>
    > > >>>>oh sorry. i tryed tranfering over samba and SCP same
    > > >>>>slow speed. on
    > > >>>>the windows machine i used normal windows networking
    > > >>>>SMB protocol.
    > > >>>>The transfer is between to local machines one
    > > >>>>windows the other debian.
    > > >>>>
    > > >>>>On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 09:56:28 -0700 (PDT), Zachary
    > > >>>>Rizer
    > > >>>><zrizer@yahoo.com> wrote:
    > > >>>>
    > > >>>>
    > > >>>1) Try not to top-post.
    > > >>>2) "Hi i had windows on this box before and the speed
    > > >>>was above 3000Kbs i installed debian and now its a
    > > >>>slow 417kbs." Take your 30000Kbs, divide it by 8, you
    > > >>>get 375KB/s. Hint: 8bits = 1byte. Debian is
    > > >>>reporting the kiloBYTES per second (~417, as you
    > > >>>reported), windows was reporting kiloBITS per second.
    > > >>>
    > > >>>
    > > >>>
    > > >>it looks like you are running your network half-duplexed though. Use
    > > >>full, you should get increases.
    > > >>
    > > >>
    > > >
    > > >Actually, re-read the output he posted from mii-tool, pasted below for
    > > >convenience. It indicates he is in fact running 100Mbps full duplex
    > > >already.
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >>Output fra mii-tool:
    > > >>eth0: negotiated 100baseTx-FD, link ok
    > > >>
    > > >>
    > > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >>product info: vendor 00:00:00, model 0 rev 0
    > > >>basic mode: autonegotiation enabled
    > > >>basic status: autonegotiation complete, link ok
    > > >>capabilities: 100baseTx-FD 100baseTx-HD
    > > >>
    > > >>
    > > >
    > > >Jacob
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > Ah, Touche!
    > > I did see that full duplex line, however, if all he is doing is
    > > transfering data, he should be get approximately twice that on a full
    > > duplex network. it looks as if part of his network isn't on full. I
    > > could be wrong but it was just a suggestion (based on the performance).
    > > Double check your windows drivers and make sure it's on in full.
    > >
    > >
    > > Paul
    > >
    > > --
    > > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
    > > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
    > >
    > >
    > 

    -- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
  • Next message: Paul Johnson: "Re: Updating regularly"