Re: aptitude: packages have been kept back?
ms419_at_freezone.co.uk
Date: 10/06/04
- Previous message: Rishi: "How to get the 2nd CPU to work?"
- In reply to: Thomas Adam: "Re: aptitude: packages have been kept back?"
- Next in thread: Brian Pack: "Re: aptitude: packages have been kept back?"
- Reply: Brian Pack: "Re: aptitude: packages have been kept back?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2004 10:46:12 -0700 To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
On Oct 2, 2004, at 1:11 AM, Thomas Adam wrote:
> --- ms419@freezone.co.uk wrote:
>> Can someone please explain why some packages might be "kept back", or
>> how I might find out?
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=aptitude
>
> Enjoy.
Thanks for the tip, Thomas, but did you mean this problem has already
been reported, or that I should submit a bug report?
If you mean this has already been reported, I can't find the bug to
which you're referring.
If you mean I should submit a bug, I'm not convinced my problem isn't
my misuse of aptitude.
I guess what I'd like to know is how to get more information about why
aptitude is concluding that these couple packages should be "kept
back", to better understand whether the fault is aptitude's or mine.
Unfortunately I haven't managed to gather this, using only aptitude's
ample documentation.
Could you please clarify what you meant, Thomas?
Thanks again!
Jack
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- Previous message: Rishi: "How to get the 2nd CPU to work?"
- In reply to: Thomas Adam: "Re: aptitude: packages have been kept back?"
- Next in thread: Brian Pack: "Re: aptitude: packages have been kept back?"
- Reply: Brian Pack: "Re: aptitude: packages have been kept back?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|