Re: (sid) kde3.3 - X performance]

From: Alan Chandler (alan_at_chandlerfamily.org.uk)
Date: 10/08/04

  • Next message: briand_at_aracnet.com: "solved debconf corruption problem"
    To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
    Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2004 17:11:11 +0100
    
    

    On Friday 08 October 2004 13:53, Riccardo Tortorici wrote:
    > You're right, I'm sorry...
    > With the same hardware (an IBM Thinkpad R40e) comparing windoze XP
    > performance and the debian/kde3.3 ones it results slower with debian,
    > let's say less reactive to the user...
    > Is there a way to optimize the performance of the graphical environment
    > (i.e. high priority to X)? I can't believe XP graphical engine runs
    > faster than kde!

    It probably has nothing to do with KDE - its depends on your video chip driver
    and whether it supports video acceleration. This is where I suggest you
    concentrate your efforts.

    First area to look is have you installed debian package xlibmesa-dri - but
    beyond that you will also have to check that correct driver is being used and
    X is not just falling back to use the default VESA settings of your video

    > I found an answer to my question on another debian ML
    > suggesting me to execute the prelink command, unfortunately there are no
    > significant improvement.

    This is nothing to do with video performance, rather start up performance (by
    prelinking libraries so it does not have to be done dynamically at the start
    of each program.

    As far as I am aware, the later releases of the GCC compiler do this anyway -
    and therefore the standard debian packages available in SID now are as good
    as it gets - which actually is pretty good compared to anything else.

    > What I'm trying to obtain is a fully graphical
    > oriented workstation (no ip_forwarding, no fw rules, no servers), i've

    Sometimes the odd server is useful - sshd allows you to connect in when all
    else fails (ie when X locks up - as it does occassionally).

    > just recompiled the kernel (2.6.8.1) and the performance are surely
    > better than before, but i need more..

    Again - really no point in compiling your own. The debian packages are all
    available for different classes of hardware - and have all the drivers that
    you need as modules.

    I think you gain a lot more in general compatibility with debian, its package
    update mechanisms in particular, if you stick with the standard packages
    rather than try to build your own. I really don't think you loose anything
    in performance.

    -- 
    Alan Chandler
    alan@chandlerfamily.org.uk
    First they ignore you, then they laugh at you,
     then they fight you, then you win. --Gandhi
    -- 
    To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org 
    with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
    

  • Next message: briand_at_aracnet.com: "solved debconf corruption problem"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Setting up a local mirror
      ... >>> http://myhost/debian/pool/ with no directory structure. ... apt-proxy - Debian archive proxy and partial mirror builder development ... madison-lite - display versions of Debian packages in an archive ...
      (Debian-User)
    • Re: ndiswrapper for the best distro?
      ... Florian Kulzer wrote: ... wireless LAN PC Card working. ... What is your reason for not using the ndiswrapper Debian packages? ...
      (Debian-User)
    • Re: PHP4 for Apache2: when ?
      ... > debian packages are far not current or partially even over some years ... everything else, server related stuff like apache, php, mysql, ... > apache 1, because of a necessary setuid module) by debian, i guess ...
      (Debian-User)
    • Re: debian and audio software
      ... > I just wondered how well developed audio software for Debian is. ... All three have official Debian packages available, ... Consider also subscribing to the Linux Audio Users mailing list: ...
      (Debian-User)
    • Re: Howto get more than 800X600 on Radon 8500.
      ... Any reasonwhy Debian ... >> having each machine have to download the packages each time from the WAN. ... X says the nvidia driver does not exist. ... > The first CD is more than sufficient to install a base system. ...
      (Debian-User)