Re: regd max file size
From: David Clymer (david_at_zettazebra.com)
Date: 10/29/04
- Previous message: JohnOfArc: "Re: Kernel 2.6.8 and usb"
- In reply to: Micheal Mukherji: "regd max file size"
- Next in thread: Ben Hutchings: "Re: regd max file size"
- Reply: Ben Hutchings: "Re: regd max file size"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: Debian Users' Mailing List <debian-user@lists.debian.org> Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 22:06:06 -0400
On Thu, 2004-10-28 at 05:49, Micheal Mukherji wrote:
> My apologies if you feel its not a thing related to debian.
>
>
> Is the 'maximum file size' a constraint of a particular file system
> implementation or the constraint of operating system?
>
Both, I believe. For example, 32bit versions of linux are limited to
smaller filesizes than are 64bit versions. However, there are filesize
limits that are particular to filesystems as well - Resierfs has a
maximum of 8TB^8 whereas fat32 has a maximum of 4GB (according to
wikipedia). So its possible that a given filesystem could allow larger
filesizes than the kernel can address or vis versa.
-davidc
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- Previous message: JohnOfArc: "Re: Kernel 2.6.8 and usb"
- In reply to: Micheal Mukherji: "regd max file size"
- Next in thread: Ben Hutchings: "Re: regd max file size"
- Reply: Ben Hutchings: "Re: regd max file size"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|