Re: faq on choosing a debian distribution - draft 1
From: John Hasler (jhasler_at_debian.org)
Date: 10/29/04
- Previous message: lado samushia: "instalation problem"
- In reply to: s. keeling: "Re: faq on choosing a debian distribution - draft 1"
- Next in thread: John Hasler: "Re: faq on choosing a debian distribution - draft 1"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: debian-user <debian-user@lists.debian.org> Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 13:27:29 -0500
s. keeling writes:
> Fixes go into _unstable_ first. Then (if they're accepted) they go into
> _stable_. Eventually, they trickle down (up?) into _testing_.
New packages (including ones with security fixes from upstream or the
maintainer) go into Unstable and then propagate to Testing. A very few
eventually go into Stable in a point release. Security fixes are
backported to Stable by the security team and the maintainer. At about the
same time Unstable gets upstream's new fixed package or perhaps the
maintainer's fix. It's rare that a security bug is fixed first in
Unstable.
> Right now, with testing (sarge) threatening to go stable, testing's
> getting updates at the same time as stable (woody) is, but that's only a
> temporary situation.
Correct. Normally Stable has the best security support, followed by
Unstable.
-- John Hasler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- Previous message: lado samushia: "instalation problem"
- In reply to: s. keeling: "Re: faq on choosing a debian distribution - draft 1"
- Next in thread: John Hasler: "Re: faq on choosing a debian distribution - draft 1"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|