Re: nv vs. nvidia - glx
From: Alvin Oga (aoga_at_ns.Linux-Consulting.com)
Date: 10/29/04
- Previous message: cls_at_truffula.sj.ca.us: "Re: Knoppix question [HD install inflexibility]"
- In reply to: Hugo Vanwoerkom: "Re: nv vs. nvidia"
- Next in thread: Hugo Vanwoerkom: "Re: nv vs. nvidia - glx"
- Reply: Hugo Vanwoerkom: "Re: nv vs. nvidia - glx"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 14:11:02 -0700 (PDT) To: Hugo Vanwoerkom <hvw59601@care2.com>
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> >>Symbol __glXActiveScreens from module
> >>/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libdri.a is unresolved!
> >>Symbol __glXActiveScreens from module
> >>/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libdri.a is unresolved!
> >
> >
> > those seem to be non-critical warnings, we have 3D stuff working w/
> > nvidia cards and openGL apps ...
> >
>
> Are you saying you have glx working with the nv driver?
yup.. glxgears ( my dummy test ) works on the box with nv and nvidia
and with those libdri.a warnings
and i saw from your XF86Config, dri module is commented out
( probably not a good idea )
- to get opengl working, as also confirmed by greg, you need to
verify that libglut* is your version and NOT a mixture of the
default installed drivers vs the new one you're loading
# should only show "todays date"
# find /lib /usr -name libglut\* -ls
# watch out for libglut*.a vs libglut.so.* too
c ya
alvin
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- Previous message: cls_at_truffula.sj.ca.us: "Re: Knoppix question [HD install inflexibility]"
- In reply to: Hugo Vanwoerkom: "Re: nv vs. nvidia"
- Next in thread: Hugo Vanwoerkom: "Re: nv vs. nvidia - glx"
- Reply: Hugo Vanwoerkom: "Re: nv vs. nvidia - glx"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|