Re: nv vs. nvidia - glx - today
From: Hugo Vanwoerkom (hvw59601_at_care2.com)
Date: 10/30/04
- Previous message: Sergio Basurto: "Re: Audio Problem"
- In reply to: Alvin Oga: "Re: nv vs. nvidia - glx - today"
- Next in thread: Alvin Oga: "Re: nv vs. nvidia - glx - today"
- Reply: Alvin Oga: "Re: nv vs. nvidia - glx - today"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 18:23:21 -0500
Alvin Oga wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Oct 2004, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
>
>
>>> # watch out for libglut*.a vs libglut.so.* too
>>>
>>
>>I got this:
>>
>>733249 496 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 500480 Sep 28 07:09
>>/usr/X11R6/lib/libGLU.so.1.3
>>733038 656 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 666440 Sep 28 07:09
>>/usr/X11R6/lib/libGLU.a
>>
>>Now I checked those against what is on CD#1 of Sarge and they are the same.
>>What do you mean by "today's date"?
>
>
> if you installed nvidia's driver from nvidia ( nvidia-*6111* )
> than you might find libglut* in other places ( /usr/lib ) besides in
> addition to the default sarge install at /usr/X11R6/lib
>
> btw... libGLU is NOT the same as libglut (which is needed for glx/openGL)
>
Right. So I installed libglut, but with the nv driver I still get:
Xlib: extension "GLX" missing on display ":0.0".
Error: couldn't get an RGB, Double-buffered visual
when running glxgears. And the GLX extension points to nvidia.6111.
Hugo
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- Previous message: Sergio Basurto: "Re: Audio Problem"
- In reply to: Alvin Oga: "Re: nv vs. nvidia - glx - today"
- Next in thread: Alvin Oga: "Re: nv vs. nvidia - glx - today"
- Reply: Alvin Oga: "Re: nv vs. nvidia - glx - today"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]