Re: Why are company's not certifying Debian?
From: Rishi (rishi.forums_at_gmail.com)
Date: 10/30/04
- Previous message: Alvin Oga: "Re: Why are company's not certifying Debian?"
- In reply to: Alvin Oga: "Re: Why are company's not certifying Debian?"
- Next in thread: Alvin Oga: "Re: Why are company's not certifying Debian?"
- Reply: Alvin Oga: "Re: Why are company's not certifying Debian?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2004 12:25:55 +0530 To: Alvin Oga <aoga@ns.linux-consulting.com>
> - if you cannot be down for more than 5 minutes... you should have 2
> complete independent systems ( properly configured and tested for
> high-availability ... ) which has NOTHING to do with raid or mirror'ing
> - if you cannot afford the extra hardware and extra time
> to configure, than that extra hw costs should be
> realistically weighed agaist how much $$$ is lost due to
> the machine failure
Hi Alvin,
Thanks for the speedy response. This high-availability thing sounds
interesting. Can you point me to some documentation on the NET that
will help me achive this? I think it's worth investing the $$$ for
this. I will try it on two spare computers at the office.
Regards
-- Rishi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- Previous message: Alvin Oga: "Re: Why are company's not certifying Debian?"
- In reply to: Alvin Oga: "Re: Why are company's not certifying Debian?"
- Next in thread: Alvin Oga: "Re: Why are company's not certifying Debian?"
- Reply: Alvin Oga: "Re: Why are company's not certifying Debian?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]