Re: Why are company's not certifying Debian? - raid
From: Tim Connors (tconnors+linuxdebianuser1099187651_at_astro.swin.edu.au)
Date: 10/31/04
- Previous message: [KS]: "Re: Default application. How to?"
- In reply to: Wim De Smet: "Re: Why are company's not certifying Debian? - raid"
- Next in thread: Wim De Smet: "Re: Why are company's not certifying Debian? - raid"
- Reply: Wim De Smet: "Re: Why are company's not certifying Debian? - raid"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2004 12:55:54 +1100
Wim De Smet <kromagg@gmail.com> said on Sat, 30 Oct 2004 16:07:58 +0200:
> Hi,
>
> please don't change the subject too much during a conversation. It
> breaks my threading and I would think that it does the same for quite
> a number of other people too.
Get a proper client. That's what the References and In-reply-to
headers are for. If your client doesn't use it, it's non compliant
with the RFCs and broken. Oh, and most likely to break other clients
which *are* compliant.
Fscking google and Outlook with their braindead implementation of the
standards.
-- TimC -- http://astronomy.swin.edu.au/staff/tconnors/ "I used to be better at logic problems, before I just dumped them all into TeX and let Knuth pick out the survivors." -- Plorkwort, 26 September 2004 on alt.religion.kibology -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- Previous message: [KS]: "Re: Default application. How to?"
- In reply to: Wim De Smet: "Re: Why are company's not certifying Debian? - raid"
- Next in thread: Wim De Smet: "Re: Why are company's not certifying Debian? - raid"
- Reply: Wim De Smet: "Re: Why are company's not certifying Debian? - raid"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|