Re: Newbie Nvidia/Woody problem

From: Kent West (westk_at_acu.edu)
Date: 11/21/04

  • Next message: Kent West: "Re: applications on gnome don't start."
    Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 10:23:26 -0600
    To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
    
    

    Brian Coiley wrote:

    > Many thanks for your reply. I really appreciate your efforts to
    > help. Unfortunately, you have overestimated my abilities! I started
    > on this literally just yesterday, and doing anything at all is
    > requiring a great deal of research and trial-and-error! Specifically:
    >
    >

    As others have suggested, I'd upgrade to Sarge or Sid; Woody is (imo)
    unusably old for a desktop system.

    (Also, top-posting is generally frowned upon on this list; the preferred
    method is to respond just below that to which you're responding.)

    > Complete Linux newbie here. Successfully partitioned the disk on my
    > W2K box, and got it dual-booting with Woody (installed from a CD
    > set). I thought that was pretty cool, and I was going good! Tried
    > startx, and got this: (EE) No devices detected.

    Rather than trying to use an nVidia driver, you might try VESA. Just run
    "dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xfree86" as root and select "vesa" (or,
    horrors!, vga) as your video device.

    > Regarding Sarge, isn't that unstable? What exactly does that mean?
    > How exactly would I switch to it? I deliberately chose to install
    > Woody, from a set of CD's, because I felt that for a complete dunce
    > like me it would be far easier than downloading and installing
    > bleeding-edge stuff that I don't understand.

    Yeah; that's the way to reply to email.

    "stable" means that this version of Debian as a whole (not individual
    packages) undergoes almost no change; only necessary changes like
    security fixes. The current version of stable is named "Woody".

    "testing" means that this version of Debian is being stretched and
    pulled and pushed and prodded in preparation for becoming the next
    "stable". The current testing is very close to becoming stable. The
    current version of testing is named "Sarge".

    "unstable" means that this version of Debian is constantly under flux;
    this package being removed; that package being added; another several
    packages being merged into one; another package split into several; new
    features added to a package; new features breaking a package, etc.
    However, the ability of a system to stay usable which has been built
    with unstable has no relation whatsoever to the name "unstable". My
    desktop workstations all run unstable. My servers run Woody. In my
    experience, an "unstable" Debian system is far more stable than a
    similarly equipped MS-Windows workstation. All versions of unstable are
    named "Sid" (for the kid next door in "Toy Story" that was always
    breaking the toys; however, some people think of it unofficially as
    Still In Development).

    For maximum usability (all the neat toys) on a workstation, I'd
    definitely recommend unstable. If you're a bit more cautious, testing is
    satisfactory today, but three months after it moves to stable, testing
    will tend to break less often than sid, but will stay broken longer than
    does sid. (When something breaks in testing, it might be a couple of
    weeks before the fix trickles in; with sid, the fix is usually within
    hours or days.) However, after testing goes to stable, you can change
    your sources.list file to point to stable, and stick with an unchanging
    system untll the next version of stable comes out in a year or seven.

    For a server, woody is still a good choice in many situations, although
    I'd probably go with testing, and then switch to stable when testing
    moves to stable.

    The advantage of moving to testing or unstable is that you'll get newer
    packages that are likely to handle your video system better. As
    mentioned, Woody is really ancient now.

    At any rate, there's an open-source driver for nVidia (called nv) in
    Debian, which is okay, and there's a proprietary driver for nVidia
    (called nvidia, I believe), which must be downloaded and partially
    compiled which means you have to have headers and maybe sources and
    maybe compile your own kernel, etc etc etc.

    You also might want to upgrade your kernel. Run "apt-get search
    kernel-image-2.6" and/or "apt-get search kernel-image-2.4" to see what
    2.6 and 2.4 kernel images are available in your current distribution
    (Woody). Then you can install one with a command like "apt-get install
    kernel-image-2.6-686-1". The "686" means its compiled to run on a
    Pentium system; a 386 would mean its for the entire 386-class of
    machines. A "k7" is for AMD, etc. "SMP" means more than one processor
    (not likely for most people - you'd likely know if you have such as
    system).

    -- 
    Kent
    -- 
    To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org 
    with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
    

  • Next message: Kent West: "Re: applications on gnome don't start."

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Old Release
      ... >could be rent asunder a woody box and it wouldn't fall over. ... >prefer a more up to date packages, debian has two other streams. ... Reading Package Lists... ...
      (Debian-User)
    • Re: Helping the newbie
      ... The stable distribution of Debian (3.0 aka Woody) was published last ... in "Security updates will be made available when needed", ... Use the testing version or unstable (Sid). ...
      (Debian-User)
    • Re: Question about Nautilus in Gnome RH 7.3
      ... After 2 yrs Debian ... > is still selling this distro of Woody as the latest stable release, ... and Sid. ...
      (linux.redhat)
    • Re: Best free server distro with long life span?
      ... > I would recommend Debian for your purposes, even if it is not easy to ... woody and hopefully soon Sid for servers) ... Servers should be run on stable (currently woody) or perhaps testing ...
      (alt.os.linux)
    • Re: best way to install asterisk
      ... simply get the source for the Sid package and backport it. ... Where are you obtaining your asterisk packages? ... going to run it in a vm and I don't care which debian I'm running. ...
      (Debian-User)