Re: Mass bug reports for packages with GFDL documentation?
From: Adam Funk (a24061_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 11/24/04
- Previous message: René Seindal: "Re: Laser Printer"
- In reply to: John Hasler: "Re: Mass bug reports for packages with GFDL documentation?"
- Next in thread: John Hasler: "Re: Mass bug reports for packages with GFDL documentation?"
- Reply: John Hasler: "Re: Mass bug reports for packages with GFDL documentation?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 20:15:40 GMT To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
On Wednesday 24 November 2004 19:50, John Hasler wrote:
>> How can you have a GNU/Linux distribution without gcc, make and
>> especially coreutils?
>
> Whatever gave you the idea that any of those packages would be
> removed?
The previous post suggested "They will be replaced with Free versions,
moved to Non-Free, or removed." But maybe it is just a question of
removing the GFDL documentation.
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- Previous message: René Seindal: "Re: Laser Printer"
- In reply to: John Hasler: "Re: Mass bug reports for packages with GFDL documentation?"
- Next in thread: John Hasler: "Re: Mass bug reports for packages with GFDL documentation?"
- Reply: John Hasler: "Re: Mass bug reports for packages with GFDL documentation?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|