Re: Debian & Contivity VPN

From: Olivier Schreiber (olivierschreiber_at_comcast.net)
Date: 11/29/04

  • Next message: Magnus Therning: "Re: VNC server desktop environment?" 
    Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 21:58:54 -0800
To: jeremyb@whirljack.net

    For what it's worth:
    --------------- Forwarded message (begin)
      Subject: Re: NAI/Netlock under Debian
      From: Matias A. Vidal Pereyra <matias@ficus.arg.hp.com>
      Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2004 07:37:47 -0700
      Newsgroup: hp.os.linux
      On Fri, 2004-09-03 at 05:06, Eric Lavarde - HP wrote:
    > Hi,
    >
    > I just wanted to ask if the new Netlock version has advantages compared
    > to the old one, beside support of newer kernels without patching the kernel.
    >
    > I am under 2.4.26 (soon 2.4.27) built with gcc 2.95.4, there is a Debian
    > package for Netlock 2.1.1, but only RPMs for 3.0 and these new RPMs seem
    > to be marked for gcc 3.3 (conclusion from the name).
    > So, I'm a bit unsure on which package I should use!?
      Eric,
          I'm currently using debian testing/unstable with nai without
      problems, I build my own kernel.org kernels. Here my setup:
      - matias@ooky:~$ gcc -v
      Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i486-linux/3.3.4/specs
      Configured with: ../src/configure -v
      --enable-languages=c,c++,java,f77,pascal,objc,ada,treelang --prefix=/usr
      Thread model: posix
      gcc version 3.3.4 (Debian 1:3.3.4-6sarge1)
      - Kernel 2.4.27 + ALSA + ACPI + pacth for nai (attached)
      - Using NAI: cvc_linux-rh8-2.1.1.tar.gz
        I tried using SuSe versions of NAI without success.
      Hope it helps!
      --
      Matias A. Vidal Pereyra <matias@ficus.arg.hp.com>
      Enterprise CSC - HP Argentina
    `--------------- Forwarded message (end) 

    -- 
Olivier Schreiber OSchreiber.ae90@gtalumni.org H323 464 5818

    --- linux-2.4.24/include/linux/skbuff.h 2003-08-25 05:44:44.000000000 -0600
    +++ linux-2.4.24-netlock/include/linux/skbuff.h 2004-02-18 11:47:26.000000000 -0700
    @@ -135,11 +135,6 @@
             struct sock *sk; /* Socket we are owned by */
                     struct timeval stamp; /* Time we arrived */
                             struct net_device *dev; /* Device we arrived on/are leaving by */
                            - struct net_device *real_dev; /* For support of point to point protocols
                            - (e.g. 802.3ad) over bonding, we must save the
                            - physical device that got the packet before
                            - replacing skb->dev with the virtual device. */
                            -
                                     /* Transport layer header */
                                             union
                                                     {
                                                    @@ -219,6 +214,11 @@
                                                     #ifdef CONFIG_NET_SCHED
                                                             __u32 tc_index; /* traffic control index */
                                                              #endif
                                                              + struct net_device *real_dev; /* For support of point to point protocols
                                                              + (e.g. 802.3ad) over bonding, we must save the
                                                              + physical device that got the packet before
                                                              + replacing skb->dev with the virtual device. */
                                                              +
                                                               };
                                                                
                                                                 #define SK_WMEM_MAX 65535 

    -- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
  • Next message: Magnus Therning: "Re: VNC server desktop environment?"