Re: RCS (Revision Control System)
From: Marc Wilson (msw_at_cox.net)
Date: 11/29/04
- Previous message: Lukas Ruf: "Re: RCS (Revision Control System)"
- In reply to: Richard Kemp: "RCS (Revision Control System)"
- Next in thread: Mateusz Łoskot: "Re: RCS (Revision Control System)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 05:08:19 -0800 To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 01:28:17PM +0100, Richard Kemp wrote:
> Which is the best RCS ? I'm a little lost between CVS, SCCS, Arch,
> Subversion ...
I don't know about "best", but so far I like arch, although it is a little
bit "opaque" regarding usage.
Arch is especially nice because you don't need a server process anywhere,
like Subversion does, but it supports changesets, like Subversion does.
-- Marc Wilson | If it's worth hacking on well, it's worth hacking msw@cox.net | on for money. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- Previous message: Lukas Ruf: "Re: RCS (Revision Control System)"
- In reply to: Richard Kemp: "RCS (Revision Control System)"
- Next in thread: Mateusz Łoskot: "Re: RCS (Revision Control System)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|