Re: debian and linus kernel, the difference??
From: Jon Dowland (dowland_at_gmail.com)
Date: 11/30/04
- Previous message: Pau Rul·lan Ferragut: "Re: Powerbook produces a lot more heat after kernel upgrade"
- In reply to: Hugo Vanwoerkom: "Re: debian and linus kernel, the difference??"
- Next in thread: Ken Bloom: "Re: debian and linus kernel, the difference??"
- Reply: Ken Bloom: "Re: debian and linus kernel, the difference??"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 16:51:24 +0000 To: Debian User List <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 10:09:45 -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom <hvw59601@care2.com> wrote:
> In general I would run WITH the patches, since powers greater than I
> have decided they would be a good idea. Debian certainly is something
> greater than I ;-)
I'm going to look at what these patches are. Back in the Herb Xu era,
I disliked the volume of backports and somewhat untested stuff that
was put in the debian kernel.
-- Jon Dowland http://jon.dowland.name/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- Previous message: Pau Rul·lan Ferragut: "Re: Powerbook produces a lot more heat after kernel upgrade"
- In reply to: Hugo Vanwoerkom: "Re: debian and linus kernel, the difference??"
- Next in thread: Ken Bloom: "Re: debian and linus kernel, the difference??"
- Reply: Ken Bloom: "Re: debian and linus kernel, the difference??"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|