Re: debian and linus kernel, the difference??
From: Ken Bloom (kabloom_at_ucdavis.edu)
Date: 11/30/04
- Previous message: Paul Johnson: "Re: creating images"
- In reply to: Jon Dowland: "Re: debian and linus kernel, the difference??"
- Next in thread: Brian P. Flaherty: "Re: debian and linus kernel, the difference??"
- Reply: Brian P. Flaherty: "Re: debian and linus kernel, the difference??"
- Reply: Alan Chandler: "Re: debian and linus kernel, the difference??"
- Reply: Jon Dowland: "Re: debian and linus kernel, the difference??"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 09:14:53 -0800
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 16:51:24 +0000, Jon Dowland wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 10:09:45 -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom <hvw59601@care2.com>
> wrote:
>
>> In general I would run WITH the patches, since powers greater than I
>> have decided they would be a good idea. Debian certainly is something
>> greater than I ;-)
>
> I'm going to look at what these patches are. Back in the Herb Xu era, I
> disliked the volume of backports and somewhat untested stuff that was put
> in the debian kernel.
Debian Kernel 2.6.8 could burn CD's.
Linus' Kernel 2.6.8 couldn't.
-- I usually have a GPG digital signature included as an attachment. See http://www.gnupg.org/ for info about these digital signatures. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- Previous message: Paul Johnson: "Re: creating images"
- In reply to: Jon Dowland: "Re: debian and linus kernel, the difference??"
- Next in thread: Brian P. Flaherty: "Re: debian and linus kernel, the difference??"
- Reply: Brian P. Flaherty: "Re: debian and linus kernel, the difference??"
- Reply: Alan Chandler: "Re: debian and linus kernel, the difference??"
- Reply: Jon Dowland: "Re: debian and linus kernel, the difference??"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|