Re: Debian sarge and production servers is it ready on 12/26/2004?

From: Steve Lamb (grey_at_dmiyu.org)
Date: 12/27/04

  • Next message: Matt Perry: "Re: Debian sarge and production servers is it ready on 12/26/2004?" 
    Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2004 21:24:00 -0800
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org

    Mitchell Laks wrote:
    > Tim said:
    > Even Sarge? I need something more up to date then woody, for my postgresql and
    > need the integration that sarge provides, vs backports + woody. Is Sarge that
    > dangerous on 12/26/2004? I want others opinions. I have 2 servers running
    > sarge 24/7 right now (for last 3 weeks.... just installed).
    > Mitchell

         Take Tim's own advice for even himself...

    >>your experience with it in this capacity is anecdotal,

         What matters is if sid *works for you.* Just because it doesn't work for
    Tim only means his case is anecdotal; just like everyone elses. If you *need*
    newer than Woody than pick a solution and see if it works /for you/. Just
    some advice from an idiot, according to Tim, who rides testing and unstable on
    4 machines, 2 of which are servers. 

    -- 
          Steve C. Lamb         | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
        PGP Key: 8B6E99C5       | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
-------------------------------+---------------------------------------------



    -- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
  • Next message: Matt Perry: "Re: Debian sarge and production servers is it ready on 12/26/2004?"

    Relevant Pages