Spamassassin package bug ?

From: Rakotomandimby (R12y) Mihamina (mihamina_at_mail.rktmb.org)
Date: 12/30/04

  • Next message: William Ballard: "Re: minimal x11 for sarge?" 
    To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 08:24:42 +0100

    On Thu, 2004-12-30 at 01:49 -0500, Matt Kettler wrote:

    > What ancient version of SA are you using? RCVD_IN_ORBS hasn't been a
    > part of SA in a LOOOOONG time. The last version of SA to include this
    > test in
    > the ruleset at all was 2.55 (may 2003).

    I already heard that on this list, and I have upgraded my
    spamassassin to the latest debian available: 3.0.1

    > 2.60 (dec 2003) shipped without this rule. That's over a year ago now.

    spamassassin 3.0.1 (Official Debian packaged)

    > From the sounds of things, you need to upgrade your whole copy of
    > SA.
    > Upgrade to 3.0.2 or at least to 2.64.

    The problem is that I already did that.
    SA is 3.0.1 (as soon as 3.0.2 is out for Debian, I'll install it).
    SA already applies the 3x rules for BAYSE_99 (just have a look at my
    thread with the subjetc "1.9 BAYSE_99" ...) but still use

    So... My guess is:
    - somewhere is a file ordering a dorslayers request, but I dont find
    it.
    - Debian recent package still use very old SA checks...

    Is there anyone knowing how Debian SA Package is done? So that we could
    find it quicker together? :-) 

    -- 
ASPO Infogérance       http://aspo.rktmb.org/activites/infogerance
Unofficial FAQ fcolc   http://faq.fcolc.eu.org/
LUG sur Orléans et alentours.
Tél : 02 38 76 43 65 (France)
  • Next message: William Ballard: "Re: minimal x11 for sarge?"

    Relevant Pages