Spamassassin package bug ?
From: Rakotomandimby (R12y) Mihamina (mihamina_at_mail.rktmb.org)
Date: 12/30/04
- Previous message: Alvin Oga: "Re: ide-scsi with 2 drives"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 08:24:42 +0100
On Thu, 2004-12-30 at 01:49 -0500, Matt Kettler wrote:
> What ancient version of SA are you using? RCVD_IN_ORBS hasn't been a
> part of SA in a LOOOOONG time. The last version of SA to include this
> test in
> the ruleset at all was 2.55 (may 2003).
I already heard that on this list, and I have upgraded my
spamassassin to the latest debian available: 3.0.1
> 2.60 (dec 2003) shipped without this rule. That's over a year ago now.
spamassassin 3.0.1 (Official Debian packaged)
> From the sounds of things, you need to upgrade your whole copy of
> SA.
> Upgrade to 3.0.2 or at least to 2.64.
The problem is that I already did that.
SA is 3.0.1 (as soon as 3.0.2 is out for Debian, I'll install it).
SA already applies the 3x rules for BAYSE_99 (just have a look at my
thread with the subjetc "1.9 BAYSE_99" ...) but still use
So... My guess is:
- somewhere is a file ordering a dorslayers request, but I dont find
it.
- Debian recent package still use very old SA checks...
Is there anyone knowing how Debian SA Package is done? So that we could
find it quicker together? :-)
-- ASPO Infogérance http://aspo.rktmb.org/activites/infogerance Unofficial FAQ fcolc http://faq.fcolc.eu.org/ LUG sur Orléans et alentours. Tél : 02 38 76 43 65 (France)
- Previous message: Alvin Oga: "Re: ide-scsi with 2 drives"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
