Re: kernel version
From: Ron Johnson (ron.l.johnson_at_cox.net)
Date: 12/30/04
- Previous message: Glenn English: "Re: kernel version"
- In reply to: YH: "Re: kernel version"
- Next in thread: Dani Belz: "Re: kernel version"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: Debian-User <debian-user@lists.debian.org> Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 15:22:51 -0600
On Fri, 2004-12-31 at 09:37 +1300, YH wrote:
> Thanks Glenn. I guess you are talking about Debian next release Sarge
> for 3.1?
>
> If I understand correctly that woody (As I installed 3.0 r2) uses 2.2
> kernel, if it is correct I'll be really surprised, the 2.2 kernel was
> the version ages ago, wasn't?
The default Debian 3.0 kernel is 2.2, but 2.4 kernels do exist in
apt. In fact, by installing with "bf2.4" instead of "linux", you'll
get a 2.4 kernel immediately at install time.
[snip]
-- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson, LA USA PGP Key ID 8834C06B I prefer encrypted mail. No matter how hard women work, train, excersize (and some of the woment in the Olympics were *muscular*), lose body fat, or get Title IX money, (the population of athletic) women will *never* be faster, stronger or better at sports(*) than (the population of athletic) men. (*Excluding "small sports" like darts.) It's just how men and women have evolved. Deal with it.
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- application/pgp-signature attachment: This is a digitally signed message part
- Previous message: Glenn English: "Re: kernel version"
- In reply to: YH: "Re: kernel version"
- Next in thread: Dani Belz: "Re: kernel version"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|