Re: Broken Konqueror?
From: Peter Nuttall (psn_at_compsoc.dur.ac.uk)
Date: 01/07/05
- Previous message: Bernhard Reiter: "Re: encountered new file extension (.dwg)"
- In reply to: Carl Fink: "Re: Broken Konqueror?"
- Next in thread: Jon Dowland: "Re: Broken Konqueror?"
- Reply: Jon Dowland: "Re: Broken Konqueror?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 13:51:56 +0000
On Friday 07 Jan 2005 10:39, Carl Fink wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 03:39:40AM +0000, Peter Nuttall wrote:
> > To explain, konqi doesn't support http, kde does. You need a package
> > called something like the kdebase-kio-plugins package to get http
> > support.
>
> So why isn't it a dependency?
>
> > Remember, konqi isn't a web browser.
>
> Yes it is. What do you mean?
>
> > PS, why are you using konqi if you don't like kde?
>
> Because I do like Konqueror. Why is that mysterious?
Sorry, I wrote my reply when both tired and mildly pissed. I note now that
1) kdebase-kio-plugins is a dependency of konqi, and 2) I missed the word
"just" out of the sentence "Remember, konqi isn't a web browser"
does your problem still exist?
Pete
PS, The reason I was wondering why you were using konqi and not kde is that
konqi drags in a lot of kde stuff, so using it as a stand alone browser
uses a lot of memory.
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- Previous message: Bernhard Reiter: "Re: encountered new file extension (.dwg)"
- In reply to: Carl Fink: "Re: Broken Konqueror?"
- Next in thread: Jon Dowland: "Re: Broken Konqueror?"
- Reply: Jon Dowland: "Re: Broken Konqueror?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
