Re: Programming Languages, "to C or not to C, that is the Q."
From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh (hmh_at_debian.org)
Date: 01/24/05
- Previous message: Scotty Fitzgerald: "Re: from a.out to running the darned thing."
- In reply to: Scotty Fitzgerald: "Re: Programming Languages, "to C or not to C, that is the Q.""
- Next in thread: Franki: "Re: Programming Languages, "to C or not to C, that is the Q.""
- Reply: Franki: "Re: Programming Languages, "to C or not to C, that is the Q.""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 10:09:59 -0200 To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005, Scotty Fitzgerald wrote:
> I might have to consider both Perl and Python. I think Perl has
> the reputation, being the "swiss army chainsaw" an all. Are these
> both of the same level of programming power?!
Yes, nowadays. But perl is still better for quicky, dirty (emphasis on
dirty) hacks, and python is still better when you need readable code.
-- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- Previous message: Scotty Fitzgerald: "Re: from a.out to running the darned thing."
- In reply to: Scotty Fitzgerald: "Re: Programming Languages, "to C or not to C, that is the Q.""
- Next in thread: Franki: "Re: Programming Languages, "to C or not to C, that is the Q.""
- Reply: Franki: "Re: Programming Languages, "to C or not to C, that is the Q.""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|