Re: My boss want to kill debian, please help !

From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh (hmh_at_debian.org)
Date: 01/28/05

  • Next message: Dave Ewart: "Re: Computer Name and IP Address"
    Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 13:05:03 -0200
    To: George Alexandru Dragoi <waruiinu@gmail.com>
    
    

    On Fri, 28 Jan 2005, George Alexandru Dragoi wrote:
    > and everything got back to normal (guess how charming the tech manager
    > has begun to talk about debian :( .
    > this is the lspci line about that e100:

    Heh.

    Still, to make things clear. The *hardware* issue with e100 that I know off
    causes the e100 PHY (not the machine. not the PCI bus. not even the entire
    e100 board) to lock up. Nothing gets sent, nothing is received. The driver
    resets the PHY after about 30s I think. It tells you that it thinks the
    hardware bug is present, and displays something to the effect of "foo
    workaround activated" on startup.

    Also, there's something else I should point out: the debian *stable* kernel
    is too old (I won't say "crap", but it is certainly useless for what I need
    it). Get the Debian kernel in testing or sid, after verifying that it is
    currently sane (as of this writing, 2.6.10-4 and 2.4.27-8, both are sane).
    Backporting policy is well and good, but it doesn't work for the kernel if
    you are using non-ancient, non-stale hardware.

    The e100/e1000 drivers have had a *ton* of fixes in the latest revisions
    (mostly due to new features such as NAPI, but...)

    My experiences with NICs tell me that you get about 1% chance of receiving a
    bad one. I got a 3COM that would cause PCI busmaster errors during high
    loads after a while, and a e100 that would hang the entire machine. But
    they were defective parts, and would have hung FreeBSD just the same...

    -- 
      "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
      them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
      where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
      Henrique Holschuh
    -- 
    To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org 
    with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
    

  • Next message: Dave Ewart: "Re: Computer Name and IP Address"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Flames over -- Re: Which is simpler?
      ... different from testing whether it has changed -- it could have changed while the system was asleep, with the result that hardware is indeed there but it's not the _same_ hardware. ... It is currently my belief that the kernel probes the hardware the same way after a cold boot, resume from s-t-r, and resume from s-t-d. ... This is why you can suspend to disk, and when you resume, your open files are still valid; the disk is found to be still there, so it continues to be accessible. ... the kernel queries the USB controller to see if a disconnect occurred while the system was asleep. ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: [00/17] Large Blocksize Support V3
      ... contiguous area of disk. ... Lets take Nick's definition of block being a disk based unit for the ... hardware specifically designed to handle 4k pages that hardware handles ... Virtually mapping the kernel was considered pretty seriously around the ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: SBS Server crash Unexpected - Error ID 6008
      ... If so, start in Safe Mode, delete all page files and reboot, then recreate your pagefile and reboot one more time ... Hard ware vendor has check hardware log, Raid Controller Log, but no hardware ... Loading Kernel Symbols ... in paging file or disk controller error. ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
    • Re: "Device 08:11 not ready" - error log
      ... > kernel: Device 08:11 not ready. ... > I need to know for which hardware, i am not able to find it in the ... is for all the partition on the disk. ...
      (RedHat)
    • Re: Slow XP
      ... Did you update hardware drivers from the manufacturer when you upgraded OS ... When was the last time you checked your hard disk for problems? ... Microsoft has these suggestions for Protecting your computer from the ... The system restore feature is a new one - first appearing in Windows ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.perform_maintain)