Re: kernel? 2.4.x vs 2.6.x
From: Robert Vangel (vangelr_at_rfgt.net)
Date: 01/30/05
- Previous message: Ron Johnson: "Re: RAID 1 : DEBIAN (WOODY) b2.4 - compatible Parallel ATA disk / compatible hardware RAID 1 controller"
- In reply to: Ron Johnson: "Re: kernel? 2.4.x vs 2.6.x"
- Next in thread: Pollywog: "Re: kernel? 2.4.x vs 2.6.x"
- Reply: Pollywog: "Re: kernel? 2.4.x vs 2.6.x"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 19:15:21 +0800 To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Ron Johnson wrote:
> Also, I have read reports that 2.6 does not play well with Samba.
> Intermittent file corruptions. Since this box will be a file
> server, this would be something to google/investigate further.
>
My file server at home (sarge) runs vanilla 2.6.10 and I haven't
*noticed* any problems. That said, the box isn't constantely being
accessed or driven to extremes of use, but it does get it's fair share
of Samba access.
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- application/x-pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
- Previous message: Ron Johnson: "Re: RAID 1 : DEBIAN (WOODY) b2.4 - compatible Parallel ATA disk / compatible hardware RAID 1 controller"
- In reply to: Ron Johnson: "Re: kernel? 2.4.x vs 2.6.x"
- Next in thread: Pollywog: "Re: kernel? 2.4.x vs 2.6.x"
- Reply: Pollywog: "Re: kernel? 2.4.x vs 2.6.x"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|