Re: kernel? 2.4.x vs 2.6.x
From: Nicos Gollan (gtdev_at_spearhead.de)
Date: 01/30/05
- Previous message: Pollywog: "Re: Kernel Upgrade?"
- In reply to: Ron Johnson: "Re: kernel? 2.4.x vs 2.6.x"
- Next in thread: Colin J. Ingram: "Re: kernel? 2.4.x vs 2.6.x"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 20:09:42 +0100
On Sunday January 30 2005 11:34, Ron Johnson wrote:
> Also, I have read reports that 2.6 does not play well with Samba.
> Intermittent file corruptions. Since this box will be a file
> server, this would be something to google/investigate further.
The kernel not handling Samba well should not have an impact on *server*
performance (other than, say, network or disk performance) since the Samba
server is a userspace program. The only part where the kernel makes a
difference should be the client side since it's the kernel that's responsible
for integrating a remote filesystem.
-- Got Backup? Jabber: Shadowdancer at jabber.fsinf.de
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: Pollywog: "Re: Kernel Upgrade?"
- In reply to: Ron Johnson: "Re: kernel? 2.4.x vs 2.6.x"
- Next in thread: Colin J. Ingram: "Re: kernel? 2.4.x vs 2.6.x"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
