Re: What does i386 exactly mean?

From: Nicos Gollan (gtdev_at_spearhead.de)
Date: 01/31/05

  • Next message: Daniel L. Miller: "Re: Replacing NFS with Samba"
    To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
    Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 16:03:44 +0100
    
    
    

    On Monday January 31 2005 15:21, andras.lorincz@gmail.com wrote:
    > The debian packages contain in their names i386. That means, as far as I
    > know, that these programs are compiled to be able to run on at least on
    > intel 386 processors. But does it also mean that if are run on newer
    > machines, they run slower because don't exploit the capabilities of the
    > newer processors?

    Yes, that's essentially true.

    > Is it worth to compile the packages before installing them, and if so are
    > there any configurations to be made to get a more optimized binary?

    For most packages, it really doesn't matter. It doesn't make much sense to
    have a shell or about any other interactive program use MMX and SSE
    extensions since those programs spend 99.9% of their time waiting for user
    input.

    There are some rare cases where a customized build will offer an advantage,
    all of them CPU intensive programs like raytracers, graphics applications,
    A/V codecs and games. Usually simply building a package from the debian
    sources will apply the correct processor-specific extensions, but it doesn't
    hurt to look through the debian/rules file before a build.

    -- 
    Got Backup?
    Jabber: Shadowdancer at jabber.fsinf.de
    
    

    -- 
    To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org 
    with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
    


  • Next message: Daniel L. Miller: "Re: Replacing NFS with Samba"

    Relevant Pages

    • unsubscribe
      ... > Subject: debian newbie... ... If I need to recompile the kernel, ... Also, what other additional packages, ... >> The package you're trying to install presumably ...
      (Debian-User)
    • Debian Weekly News - July 20th, 2004 (fwd)
      ... Debian Weekly News - July 20th, ... General Resolution to force AMD64 into Sarge? ... his plan to upload gcc-3.4 packages to unstable. ... the Free Software Printing Summit that was held during this year's LSM ...
      (comp.os.linux.announce)
    • Re: Before going with debian questions.
      ... > and is slow to get security updates. ... selected packages installed from unstable, ... I'd recommend running Debian for 3-6 months before hopping onto the ... many bugs _are_ caught in the first ten days of release. ...
      (Debian-User)
    • Re: Running testing? -- read this.
      ... I'm just an average Testing user, have been for a while, and around me almost every Debian users I know are using Testing, mostly because it's the Debian's flavour which can compare with other distros in term of being usable on a reasonably new computer, with up-to-date softwares. ... be considered a developer-only version, and according to my experience (i use it for work, along with Ubuntu stations... ... better still (it has NEWER packages!), but Unstable must not work well, ... You will also get the pleasure of finding all the bugs, ...
      (Debian-User)
    • Debian Weekly News - August 17th, 2004 (fwd)
      ... Debian Weekly News - August 17th, ... Investigating Sarge Security. ... installing only a minimal number of packages, ...
      (comp.os.linux.announce)