Re: Replacing NFS with Samba
From: Daniel L. Miller (dmiller_at_amfes.com)
Date: 01/31/05
- Previous message: Nicos Gollan: "Re: What does i386 exactly mean?"
- In reply to: Robert Brockway: "Re: Replacing NFS with Samba"
- Next in thread: Robert Brockway: "Re: Replacing NFS with Samba"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 07:08:24 -0800 To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Robert Brockway wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Jan 2005, Kadmos wrote:
>
>> You could also try to "soft" mount the NFS share (but according to
>> "man mount" it might not be a good idea)
>
>
> It really is debatable. Soft mounting reduces reliability in the face
> of a network problem but the nfs client avoids getting dragged to its
> knees everytime there is a slight outage. Last time I checked Sun was
> recommending soft mounting on Solaris.
>
But will that eliminate my X-Windows lockup? Or is that a separate
issue? While X-Windows is frozen, I can still ssh into that workstation
- I just can't affect X-Windows at all.
-- Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- Previous message: Nicos Gollan: "Re: What does i386 exactly mean?"
- In reply to: Robert Brockway: "Re: Replacing NFS with Samba"
- Next in thread: Robert Brockway: "Re: Replacing NFS with Samba"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]