Re: Kerberos should be in the base system
From: Andreas Ehn (ehn_at_kth.se)
Date: 02/01/05
- Previous message: Paul: "Re: "Package is in a very bad inconsistent state" and j2sdk1.4"
- In reply to: Kirk Strauser: "Kerberos should be in the base system"
- Next in thread: Kirk Strauser: "Re: Kerberos should be in the base system"
- Reply: Kirk Strauser: "Re: Kerberos should be in the base system"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2005 20:35:45 +0100
Tue 2005-02-01 at 10:00 -0600 Kirk Strauser wrote:
> I propose that Debian select a Kerberos implementation and include it as
> part of the base system.
I second this. Unfortunately, it seems that part of Debian is going in
the opposite direction, having recently unkerberized the Evolution MUA
packages in response to this bug report:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=285908
Regards,
Andreas
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- Previous message: Paul: "Re: "Package is in a very bad inconsistent state" and j2sdk1.4"
- In reply to: Kirk Strauser: "Kerberos should be in the base system"
- Next in thread: Kirk Strauser: "Re: Kerberos should be in the base system"
- Reply: Kirk Strauser: "Re: Kerberos should be in the base system"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
