Re: (OT) Defining Variables in C with Bases other than 2 or 16
From: Kirk Strauser (kirk_at_strauser.com)
Date: 02/16/05
- Previous message: Carl Fink: "Re: mailman 2.1 on stable"
- In reply to: martin f krafft: "Re: (OT) Defining Variables in C with Bases other than 2 or 16"
- Next in thread: martin f krafft: "Re: (OT) Defining Variables in C with Bases other than 2 or 16"
- Reply: martin f krafft: "Re: (OT) Defining Variables in C with Bases other than 2 or 16"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 21:32:49 -0600
On Tuesday 15 February 2005 06:34 pm, martin f krafft wrote:
> Use the fact that 2^18 % 12 == 0
Umm, you sure about that? Whether "^" means "to the power of" or "xor", 2^18
is not divisible by twelve (or any other non-power-of-two number).
-- Kirk Strauser
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: Carl Fink: "Re: mailman 2.1 on stable"
- In reply to: martin f krafft: "Re: (OT) Defining Variables in C with Bases other than 2 or 16"
- Next in thread: martin f krafft: "Re: (OT) Defining Variables in C with Bases other than 2 or 16"
- Reply: martin f krafft: "Re: (OT) Defining Variables in C with Bases other than 2 or 16"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|