Re: "permanent modules"
From: Miguel Filho (miguel_at_ccuec.unicamp.br)
Date: 02/17/05
- Previous message: Dave Ewart: "Re: Ominous looking syslog messages"
- In reply to: Gorazd Brumen: "Re: "permanent modules""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 13:18:35 -0200
Em Qua, 2005-02-16 ās 19:28 +0100, Gorazd Brumen escreveu:
> >
> > Looks like some kind of bug or new feature, I don't get it.
> >
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/1/6/23
>
> What, today bugs and new features dont differ or what??
>
> Bye,
> G.
>
By the message of Alan Cox, I understand that this "permanent" is
something that they use in development. I Don't get it why it is
"enabled" in 2.6.10.
-- Miguel Di Ciurcio Filho Linux Professional ID 22833 Linux User # 347217 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- Previous message: Dave Ewart: "Re: Ominous looking syslog messages"
- In reply to: Gorazd Brumen: "Re: "permanent modules""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|