NFS / file size limits - something broken

From: Mason Loring Bliss (mason_at_blisses.org)
Date: 02/28/05

  • Next message: michael: "Re: tft monitors -- advice? XF86Config's?"
    Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 12:04:01 -0500
    To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
    
    
    

    Hey, all.

    I just said "dump -1au -h 0 -f - / | gzip -c1 > /foo_on_nfs/bar" on a
    Debian Sarge/i386 box, with foo_on_nfs being a mount from another Sarge/i386
    box, and with both / and foo_on_nfs being natively ext3.

    Dump died with "File size limit exceeded". The file is 2147483647 bytes long,
    which is a byte short of two gigs.

    Is there a dump(8) available that does not choke off once its output file
    size exceeds two gigabytes / 31 bits? This seems to be a pretty serious
    limitation given the sorts of data one might expect to back up nowadays...

    I'm pretty sure this limitation is specific to dump(8) on Debian, as I
    have NetBSD systems dumping much larger files onto the same partition.

    Thanks in advance for suggestions! I'd really like to avoid the use of tar
    for this job, but I'll use it if I must, assuming it has no equivalent file
    size limitations.

    Gaak! I just noticed something else that's seriously disturbing.

    This is a NetBSD 2.0 system mounting this particular Debian-served NFS
    filesystem:

    acheron /root# ls -l /usr/backup/full/
    total 15739508
    -rw------- 1 root wheel 7899232767 Feb 20 04:40 20050220-0405-0-5-SLASH.gz
    -rw------- 1 root wheel 7947841483 Feb 27 04:41 20050227-0405-0-6-SLASH.gz
    -rw------- 1 root wheel 254421086 Feb 26 18:53 G-20050226-1851-0-6-SLASH.gz

    Here's a Sarge system with the same filesystem mounted:

    goliath /root# ls -l /usr/backup/full/
    total 15739508
    -rw------- 1 root root 3604265471 Feb 20 04:40 20050220-0405-0-5-SLASH.gz
    -rw------- 1 root root 3652874187 Feb 27 04:41 20050227-0405-0-6-SLASH.gz
    -rw------- 1 root root 254421086 Feb 26 18:53 G-20050226-1851-0-6-SLASH.gz

    Here's the view from the server itself:

    memory /root# ls -l /usr/backup/full/
    total 15739508
    -rw------- 1 root root 7899232767 Feb 20 04:40 20050220-0405-0-5-SLASH.gz
    -rw------- 1 root root 7947841483 Feb 27 04:41 20050227-0405-0-6-SLASH.gz
    -rw------- 1 root root 254421086 Feb 26 18:53 G-20050226-1851-0-6-SLASH.gz

    There is something very wrong here... Is Debian's NFS client broken for
    large files?

    PS: Both Debian systems noted here are running stock kernels. Goliath is
    running 2.6.8-2-686-smp and Memory is running 2.6.8-1-386.

    PPS: If I serve the large files listed above from a NetBSD host, both
    Debian clients are able to see the correct sizes. So, the NFS glitch
    only appears when a Debian NFS server is being used by a Debian NFS client.
    Copying the file ends up copying over the size listed by ls, or a bit less
    than half the actual file.

    Thanks in advance for clues, advice, and help!

    -- 
    Mason Loring Bliss   ((  "In the drowsy dark cave of the mind dreams
    mason@blisses.org     ))  build  their nest  with fragments  dropped
    http://blisses.org/  ((   from day's caravan." - Rabindranath Tagore
    
    

    -- 
    To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org 
    with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
    


  • Next message: michael: "Re: tft monitors -- advice? XF86Config's?"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: grub bootet nach NetBSD nicht mehr
      ... > Bei ersten Boot läßt sich im Menue Debian problemlos starten (auch ... > Wird EINMAL NetBSD (rootnoverify ... > Rechnerstart Grub kein Bootmenue mehr und bleibt haengen. ...
      (comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc)
    • Re: Debian ARM or NetBSD or neither for RiscPC?
      ... support my SCSI card, but at least the documentation tells me what it ... But before I buy one does anyone have any experience of using NetBSD, ... I don't see why you think Debian won't be around - the latest releases might ... RPCs, so there should be less of a problem installing it if you follow the ...
      (comp.sys.acorn.apps)
    • Re: Talk on "Why Linux, Why Debian"
      ... | Debian packages trace theirs relationships to each other not merely through ... I'm not sure what somebody totally unfamiliar with the Debian packaging system ... | When it comes to portability, NetBSD is supposed to be the byword. ... | I found that debian supports ibm s/390 and ia64, ...
      (Debian-User)
    • Which OS for Sparc Station 5?
      ... tend towards using Debian or NetBSD, as Solaris 10 should be horribly ... The Sparc is merely for fun, it just needs to run sshd and perhaps some ...
      (comp.sys.sun.hardware)