Re: What's wrong with debian?
From: Jan Lühr (jluehr_at_gmx.net)
Date: 02/28/05
- Previous message: Jan Lühr: "Re: What's wrong with debian?"
- In reply to: Michael Marsh: "Re: What's wrong with debian?"
- Next in thread: Robert Brockway: "Re: What's wrong with debian?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 23:35:16 +0100
Greetings,...
Am Montag, 28. Februar 2005 23:19 schrieb Michael Marsh:
> On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 23:12:28 +0100, Jan Lühr <jluehr@gmx.net> wrote:
> > So, you are saying, that the release process of sarge has been done
> > correctly?
>
> The process isn't necessarily the issue. What matters is the product.
> I'm sure the developers have learned a lot during the stabilization
> of Sarge, and will be able to release Etch with a much shorter delay.
> If the process is flawed, that's no reason to release Sarge before
> it's really ready. Keep in mind that an entirely new installer was
> developed for Sarge, and that the size of the repository almost
> doubled. Even with the best release process, and developers being
> paid to work on the distribution full time, that's going to take
> awhile to stabilize.
Of course the product matters. But multiple false announcements neither help
the product nor the customers nor anyone else.
Keep smiling
yanosz
- Previous message: Jan Lühr: "Re: What's wrong with debian?"
- In reply to: Michael Marsh: "Re: What's wrong with debian?"
- Next in thread: Robert Brockway: "Re: What's wrong with debian?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
