Re: What's wrong with debian?
From: Miquel van Smoorenburg (miquels_at_cistron.nl)
Date: 03/01/05
- Previous message: Patrick DUBAU: "Re: dell 2850 kernel 2.6.10 very slow (solved)"
- In reply to: Eric Gaumer: "Re: What's wrong with debian?"
- Next in thread: Eric Gaumer: "Re: What's wrong with debian?"
- Reply: Eric Gaumer: "Re: What's wrong with debian?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2005 10:38:49 +0000 (UTC) To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
In article <4223EB8B.5060901@ecs.fullerton.edu>,
Eric Gaumer <gaumerel@ecs.fullerton.edu> wrote:
>Don't see the world through narrow blinders. The fact that Debian is
>ported to so many
>different architectures makes it great for embedded devices an other
>things that don't
>contain an Intel, AMD, or a PPC chipset. Go over to the LKML and tell
>them they should drop
>support for a few obscure architectures to speed up kernel releases and
>see how they react.
Actually, it happens on a regular base that a new kernel gets
released and that one or more architectures are known broken
because the maintainers haven't caught up or synced in time.
Mike.
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- Previous message: Patrick DUBAU: "Re: dell 2850 kernel 2.6.10 very slow (solved)"
- In reply to: Eric Gaumer: "Re: What's wrong with debian?"
- Next in thread: Eric Gaumer: "Re: What's wrong with debian?"
- Reply: Eric Gaumer: "Re: What's wrong with debian?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
Loading