Re: Voice Chat

From: Tom Moore (tom_at_tomstroubleshooting.com)
Date: 03/15/05

  • Next message: Bruno Hertz: "Re: Voice Chat" 
    Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 15:34:49 -0500
To: Bruno Hertz <brrhtz@yahoo.de>

    I'm not currently using a modem, but I have used it with a modem and the program works quite well.
    Bandwidth is less than 28.8 probably like say 19.2 or so and latency is not really a problem.
    One draw back though is it is only half duplex so you'll have to operate it like a cb radio.
    Press space when you want to talk, and once again when your finished.
    If you can handle that little problem it works well.
    If you want to cjoin a reflector and see how the quality is try:
    gene3.ait.iastate.edu:4074

    Tom

    On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 09:16:55PM +0100, Bruno Hertz wrote:
    > On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 14:55 -0500, Tom Moore wrote:
    > > Hi guys,
    > > I currently use Speak Freely for my voice chatting. Works well and can support multiple clients if using a reflector that operates like a relay between the people in the chat.
    > > This feature is used when three or more people want to joing the same conversation.
    > >
    > > Tom
    >
    > Interesting, it's under development again. Do you have dialup
    > connections? You need to share IP addresses first, right? How
    > do you do that?
    >
    > And out of curiosity, how's audio quality, latency and bandwidth
    > consumption?
    >
    > Regards, Bruno.
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > --
    > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
    > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
    > 

    -- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
  • Next message: Bruno Hertz: "Re: Voice Chat"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: POTS question
      ... In the normal POTS, ... Now, I understand M-ary signalling, data modems, and multiphase ... suddenly being able to handle a 26khz min bandwidth. ... First, your data modem sends at 56K bits per second, not baud. ...
      (sci.electronics.design)
    • Re: FMCW radar signal processing independent of sweep time
      ... Thank you ever so much for this reply, Tom; ... Concerning the DAC, I will incorporate one into my design. ... distance to the reflector without homodyning the two signals? ... The disadvantage is that the receiver bandwidth must equal the ...
      (comp.dsp)
    • Re: Tom Kunich
      ... > stalking for all the bandwidth destroyed. ... > wasn't just stupid crap like he posts now. ... I have a question, Tom. ... Signal or noise, Tom? ...
      (rec.bicycles.racing)
    • Re: Is there a download cap for using 4.2.2.2 and 4.2.2.1?
      ... Comcast places a download/upload bandwidth cap for all it's ... As for internet, we still have Comcast Cable TV, so ... > modem (this modem does not belong to Comcast, it is a modem that I ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.server.dns)
    • Re: Max ADSL and domestic wiring
      ... Then connect all the xtension cables/socket to the insertion displacement connectors on the back of the new faceplate.If necessary to a new socket next to it. ... Than get a very long RJ11 extension cable and plug your modem directly into the ADSL socket on the front of the master socket. ... You will however always find that wherever you put your 56k modem you will only get slow speeds due to the filters and the fact that the ADSL equipment in the exchange can mess up the residual digital signals that the 56k modems use. ... Is it likely to be reducing my bandwidth? ...
      (uk.telecom.broadband)