Re: Serious apt-get problem -- horked whole system
From: Hal Vaughan (hal_at_thresholddigital.com)
Date: 03/25/05
- Previous message: Kevin Mark: "Re: Newest kde onto stable"
- In reply to: Ron Johnson: "Re: Serious apt-get problem -- horked whole system"
- Next in thread: Kevin Mark: "Re: Serious apt-get problem -- horked whole system"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 01:16:45 -0500
On Thursday 24 March 2005 09:03 am, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 01:17 -0500, Hal Vaughan wrote:
> > On Thursday 24 March 2005 12:53 am, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 00:03 -0500, Hal Vaughan wrote:
> > > > I was using Ethereal, and reading the docs, when I realized the docs
> > > > were for a newer version, so I added it with:
> > > >
> > > > apt-get install etherial=.10.??-? -t testing
> > > >
> > > > (I can't remember the exact version number that I found was
> > > > available.)
> > > >
> > > > This caused a problem with libgtk2.0-bin, where I kept getting an
> > > > error
>
> [snip]
>
> > > > have to deal with all the programs that won't restart with this
> > > > package (and all that depended on it) removed. I do NOT have time to
> > > > re-install my workstation.
> > > >
> > > > Any suggestions?
> > >
> > > Hi, Hal.
> >
> > Hi, Ron. Guess you can't hide from me.
>
> No, you can't. Ever.
Yes, I can. All I have to do is agree with you about politics and religion
and you'll get so bored, you'll wander off for a good debate.
> > > Aren't you running Mepis, i.e., a mixed system?
> >
> > No. This one is the one remaining Libranet system.
> >
> > And that might change if I get the program I'm working on soon enough, I
> > might have time to re-install this with either Mepis or the new Sarge
> > installer.
>
> I'd suggest that the problem is that you are trying to install
> something new on a relatively old and mixed (package-wise) system.
>
> > Otherwise, I want to fix it without having to backup /home and everything
>
> Aren't you backing up /home regularly, anyway? Especially since
> this is your *business* computer?
About all that's stored in my /home dir is my settings and a various files
I've saved there while experimenting. I still think and organize files in
the way I did on my first computer (an Apple //e with a 5 meg hd -- back when
I had no idea how I could fill up a 5 meg drive -- much less a 10 meg the
same company offered!). All my business files are backed up regularly
(thanks to rsync), and regularly burned to DVD or CD (on rotating media, with
one of the most recent copies stored here, and one in the safe deposit box).
My business stuff is on a separate computer which is set aside to do NOTHING
but the business. It can easily be yanked from my LAN and put into another
if I need to (I still don't have everything packaged so I can easily install
the system on a new machine). I don't want the whole thing in my /home dir,
and I don't want it on my workstation (since that's where I experiment if I
have time).
> > else that goes with re-installing, but keeping my settings and data.
>
> I /home on it's own partition?
In this case, no, but after reading the above, I'm sure you can see why I
didn't worry about that. When I get back to writing, it'll be a different
story about where all my work is. Right now, though, with a program under
development, it's location can matter.
Hal
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- Previous message: Kevin Mark: "Re: Newest kde onto stable"
- In reply to: Ron Johnson: "Re: Serious apt-get problem -- horked whole system"
- Next in thread: Kevin Mark: "Re: Serious apt-get problem -- horked whole system"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
